facebook rss twitter

Warning! Xbox 360, PS3 and Wii playing dirty

by Steven Williamson on 21 May 2008, 09:54

Tags: Nintendo Wii, Nintendo (TYO:7974), Wii

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qanc7

Add to My Vault: x

An investigation by Greenpeace into hazardous materials present in the most popular game consoles has revealed that Nintendo Wii, Sony PlayStation 3 and Microsoft Xbox 360 have all tested postitive.

The investigation, entitled 'Playing Dirty' has revealed:

The use of hazardous chemicals and materials in electronic products is widespread. Despite some recent improvements – a result of a combination of legal restrictions in some parts of the world, and voluntary action by companies – many devices still contain a variety of hazardous substances.

So what are the big boys doing about it? Well, the report states that Microsoft has made a commitment to eliminate the use of PVC and BFRs in its hardwareby 2010 . Sony committed to phase out PVC and certain uses of BFRs by 2010, though only for its mobile products and not including game consoles other than the PSP and Nintendo very recently committed to eliminate PVC in its products, but failed to give a timeline for doing so .

Amongst other things, the report concluded that:

All three consoles included PVC-based materials containing other types of plasticiser chemicals, principally a mellitate and various adipates, at apparently high levels in some instances. The use of these substances provides flexibility to the materials without the use of phthalates, but raises similar concerns regarding the potential for resulting exposure to, and toxicity of, these leachable chemical additives. Rather than providing reassurance, therefore, their presence highlights the reliance on leachable additives that stems from the use of PVC as a material and the value in replacing PVC with polymers that do not require the use of such additives.

What does this mean to the consumer? Well, if you read the long report on the official Greenpeace website you can come to your own conclusions. As far as we can gather, you shouldn't try licking your console for any sustained period.


HEXUS Forums :: 10 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
I am a major advocate for Greenpeace. Knowing that, I'd like to say that this “research” is nothing more than grandstanding on Greenpiece' part.

Why do I say that? The chemicals used to construct consoles are used far more in other items across the world. I'm going to give game consoles a conservative estimate at 0.00009% of the problem.

How about global warming is caused by removing oil from the earth. Oil is the earth's natural coolant. When it is removed, the crust does not stay cool. In turn that raises the temperature of the ocean. Something the governments do not want us to know. Instead they let Al Gore tell the world that Global warming is cause by the sun's rays reflecting off of the white ice caps.

How about, we're cutting down all of our forests and Jungles. We're over fishing the oceans, so much so that they are left with no natural filters.

Green Peace needs to prioritize their agenda a little better. Game Consoles should be # 800 million on their To-Do List.
Greenpeace have just jumped on the “consoles are evil” ban wagon.

Bloody waste of time if thier not burning diesel in thier crappy old boat in a futile attempt to stop some thing or another they're moaing about the least important pollutants around.

In the words of Cartman

I hate hippies! I mean, the way they always talk about “protectin' the earth” and then drive around in cars that get poor gas mileage and wear those stupid bracelets - I hate ‘em! I wanna kick ’em in the nuts!
I think they've done fine - I'm sure pressure from similar organisations played some role in the RoHS legislation which I think is a good thing. Nothing wrong with continuing to campaign to try and make things better.

As for why target consoles? That's rather simple - it's an objective that's obtainable. Sure, the world might be a better place if we stopped extracting oil tomorrow, but that's not a realistic aim. As they've proven with RoHS, reducing undesirable substances in luxury entertainment devices is achievable.
superdynamite
I am a major advocate for Greenpeace. Knowing that, I'd like to say that this “research” is nothing more than grandstanding on Greenpiece' part.

Why do I say that? The chemicals used to construct consoles are used far more in other items across the world. I'm going to give game consoles a conservative estimate at 0.00009% of the problem.

How about global warming is caused by removing oil from the earth. Oil is the earth's natural coolant. When it is removed, the crust does not stay cool. In turn that raises the temperature of the ocean. Something the governments do not want us to know. Instead they let Al Gore tell the world that Global warming is cause by the sun's rays reflecting off of the white ice caps.

How about, we're cutting down all of our forests and Jungles. We're over fishing the oceans, so much so that they are left with no natural filters.

Green Peace needs to prioritize their agenda a little better. Game Consoles should be # 800 million on their To-Do List.

Interesting. Xbox 360, PS3 and Wii are hot-topics at the moment. Would you not say that investigating these consoles is good for their profile, which in turn is good for raising awareness on other issues on their agenda? If that was their goal, they've just done a good job. I was rooting around hteir website, something I would never have done if this issue hadn't come up.
kalniel
I think they've done fine - I'm sure pressure from similar organisations played some role in the RoHS legislation which I think is a good thing. Nothing wrong with continuing to campaign to try and make things better.

As for why target consoles? That's rather simple - it's an objective that's obtainable. Sure, the world might be a better place if we stopped extracting oil tomorrow, but that's not a realistic aim. As they've proven with RoHS, reducing undesirable substances in luxury entertainment devices is achievable.

It maybe obtainable but what will it actually achive? China is building 550 coal fired power stations, itll take more than a few trees, or less PVC in consoles to offset that.

Not that I'm that bothered, I'm still to be convinced global warming is anything other than a natural cycle, and even if it isnt its a little to late to do any thing now. A serious case of closing the stable door after the horse has bolted.