facebook rss twitter

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 notebook review

by Parm Mann on 22 June 2011, 17:00 3.5

Tags: Lenovo

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qa6gz

Add to My Vault: x

Performance

The ThinkPad X1 is the first Intel Sandy Bridge notebook to hit our benchmark suite, and it's likely to run circles around most last-generation competitors. To see how it compares, we're lining it up against a range of 11.6in - 14.5in systems, including one equipped with AMD's latest A8-3500M APU.

Here's a detailed look at the key specifications of our eight comparison notebooks, as well as a brief rundown of the benchmarks we use.

Comparison Notebooks

Laptop Dell Inspiron M101z Lenovo ThinkPad Edge 11 ASUS Eee PC 1215N Acer Timeline 3810T ASUS U35JC Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Generic AMD Llano HP Envy 14-1050EA
Processor AMD Athlon II Neo K325 (1.30GHz, 2MB L2 cache, dual-core, 15W) AMD Athlon II Neo K325 (1.30GHz, 2MB L2 cache, dual-core, 15W) Intel Atom D525 (1.80GHz, 1MB L2 cache, dual-core, 13W) Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 (1.40GHz, 3MB L2 cache, dual-core, 10W) Intel Core i3-370M (2.4GHz, 3MB smart cache, dual-core, 35W) Intel Core i5-2520M (2.50GHz, 3MB smart cache, dual-core, 35W) AMD A8-3500M (1.50GHz, 4MB L2 cache, quad-core, 35W) Intel Core i5-450M (2.40GHz, 3MB smart cache, dual-core, 35W)
Memory 4GB DDR3 4GB DDR3 2GB DDR3 2GB DDR3 4GB DDR3 4GB DDR3 4GB DDR3 4GB DDR3
Graphics AMD Mobility Radeon HD 4225 AMD Mobility Radeon HD 4225 Intel GMA 3150 + NVIDIA ION 2 Intel GMA 4500MHD Intel HD Graphics + NVIDIA GeForce 310M 1GB Intel HD 3000 AMD Radeon 6620G + Mobility Radeon 6630 1GB Intel HD Graphics + AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5650 1GB
Graphics driver AMD Catalyst 10.7 AMD Catalyst 10.11 Intel 8.14.10.2117 + NVIDIA Verde 260.89 Intel 7.15.10.1666 Intel 8.15.10.2182 + NVIDIA Verde 258.96 Intel 8.15.10.2321 AMD Catalyst 11.5 Intel 8.15.10.2182 + AMD Catalyst 10.9
Display 11.6in - 1,366x768 11.6in - 1,366x768 12.1in - 1,366x768 13.3in - 1,366x768 13.3in - 1,366x768 13.3in - 1,366x768 14in - 1,366x768 14.5in - 1,366x768
Battery 6 cell, 56Whr 6 cell, 57Whr 6 cell, 56Whr 6 cell, 56Whr 8 cell, 84Whr 6 cell, 38.4Whr 6 cell, 58Whr 8 cell, 59Whr
Weight 1,572g (including battery) 1,513g (including battery) 1,523g (including battery) 1,645g (including battery) 1,816g (including battery) 1,741g (including battery) 2,179g (including battery) 2,589g (including battery)
Wireless Broadcom WLAN Half-Mini Card (802.11bgn) and Bluetooth ThinkPad 1x1 WLAN Half-Mini Card (802.11bgn) and Bluetooth Broadcom WiFi (802.11bgn) and Bluetooth Intel WiFi 5100 (802.11bgn) and Bluetooth Intel WiFi 5100 (802.11bgn) and Bluetooth Intel Centrino Ultimate-N 6300 (802.11bgn) and Bluetooth Realtek WLAN (802.11bgn) and Bluetooth 2.1 Broadcom 43224AG (802.11bgn) and Bluetooth
Disk drive Seagate Momentus 320GB HDD, 7,200RPM, 16MB cache Hitachi Travelstar 320GB HDD, 5,400RPM, 8MB cache Seagate Momentus 250GB HDD, 5,400RPM, 8MB cache Hitachi 500GB HDD, 5,400RPM, 8MB cache Seagate Momentus 320GB HDD, 5,400RPM, 8MB cache Hitachi Travelstar 320GB HDD, 7,200RPM, 16MB cache Hitachi Travelstar 250GB HDD, 7,200RPM, 8MB cache Seagate Momentus 500GB HDD, 7,200RPM, 16MB cache
Optical drive None None None None None None Blu-ray/DVD RW combo DVD-RW
Operating System Microsoft Windows 7 Home premium, 64-bit Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium, 64-bit Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium, 32-bit Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium, 32-bit Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium, 64-bit Microsoft Windows 7 Professional, 64-bit Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium SP1, 64-bit Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium, 64-bit
Approx. price as configured £500 £530 £430 £500 £650 £1,200 N/A £1,000

Benchmarks

Geekbench A cross-platform benchmark used to measure memory and processor performance. Run using high-performance mode.
Cinebench Using Cinebench's multi-CPU render, this cross-platform benchmark stresses as many cores as possible. Run using high-performance mode.
3DMark06 A PC benchmark used to test the DirectX 9 performance of a system's graphics card. Run using high-performance mode.
Power Consumption Using balanced power settings, we record mains power draw whilst playing back a 720p movie trailer.
Battery Test In order to measure battery life, we run the notebook on balanced power settings and loop a 720p movie trailer, measuring the time taken to hibernate.

CPU and GPU performance

The Core i5-2520M CPU certainly has legs, and it's more than enough to propel the ThinkPad X1 to the top of the Geekbench chart.

Overall system performance is very good, but for a £1,180 machine, the ThinkPad X1 is lacking the instant-response of a solid-state drive. Windows 7 takes over a minute to boot, and the hard disk can be a bottleneck. At this price, we'd quite happily take a slower CPU if it meant replacing the HDD with an SSD.

Looking solely at CPU performance, Cinebench confirms that the Core i5-2520M is a noticeable step up from the previous generation. When compared to the HP Envy 14's Core i5-450M, we see a performance jump of 35 per cent. Impressive, considering that both chips maintain a 35W TDP.

AMD's Radeon-infused A8-3500M APU gives the Llano notebook the edge in graphics, but the ThinkPad X1's integrated Intel HD 3000 IGP isn't a slouch. It's perfectly adequate for high-def multimedia playback, but demanding 3D games are out of its reach - we scored an average frame rate of less than 15fps while attempting to run Just Cause 2.

Power consumption and battery life

Power draw while playing back a 720p movie is in line with most other notebooks of this size, but here's the catch; the comparisons are armed with at least 56Whr batteries. The tighter confines of the ThinkPad X1 limit it to just a 38.4Whr battery.

Battery life, ultimately, is the ThinkPad X1's first big compromise. In our rundown test - which entails looping a 720p movie clip with 50 per cent screen brightness and all wireless radios disabled - the notebook ran out of steam shortly after passing the three-hour mark.

That's a distinctly-average result, and it makes the X1's optional battery slice more of a necessity than a luxury.

What is useful, though, is Lenovo's RapidCharge technology. In our tests, we were able to get the depleted battery back up to a 70 per cent charge in just 24 minutes.