facebook rss twitter

Kingston says SSDs are for acceleration, not storage

by Sylvie Barak on 20 October 2009, 16:29

Tags: Kingston

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaujf

Add to My Vault: x

Acceleration is key

But Kingston is also quick to point out that it sees SSD usage in a different light to most other vendors.

"Kingston views solid-state drives as a performance upgrade and not a storage solution," says Leathem explaining that just as increasing system memory can raise performance, an SSD can do the same.

Kingston says it's all about increasing the performance of what you already have. Why do users bung more RAM into their PCs? To make them run better. Exactly the same with SSDs, says the firm.

"We took it a step further by adding bundle kits to many of our SSD products to make the upgrade path from hard-disk drive to SSD as easy as possible," he added noting that by doing this, the firm hoped to make it "that much better and simpler for customers to see the inherent benefits of using SSDs to upgrade and extend the life of their current systems."

The memory-module maker reckons it's also very important the drives are priced realistically to represent their function as an upgrade, with Leathem maintaining that "anything around $100 is a really good mass market upgrade price."

Leathem declared his firm was "not in a race to reach the terabyte," like some of its competitors in the SSD space, saying "that's just not what Kingston does. Instead, we're going to focus on form factors - and performance upgrades for the mainstream."

He also predicted punters would see Kingston coming out with a Raid ready kit very soon indeed and that 512GB would probably be shipping by the end of the year. Also by around December 2009, Leathem told HEXUS his firm would be refreshing its V+ performance.

At the end of the day, Leathem noted it was all about "price, simplicity, range of products and really focusing on the upgrade."

Also, in a seemingly generous statement to Kingston's competitors, Leathem concluded "there's room for all of us in the SSD market." 

 



HEXUS Forums :: 11 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
At the moment, are any enthusiast really bothered about high capacity SSD? I can't do with 32GB and would feel too constrained even with 64GB. But 128-256GB drives is quite adequate as a system drive for me.
I agree fully with this. When price becomes acceptable to me I'll get the fastest SSD possible as a system drive for OS and high performance apps. It wouldnt even have to be 100GB, anything above 32GB would do (I'd probably aim for 64-80GB).

(Then I'll have my 1TB F1 for apps like games which are large but not hugely speed dependant. Finally my slow 1.5TB F2 will store all my media etc.)
I use an 80GB intel SSD for a system drive - ‘hybrid’ systems are the way of things for the time being given the cost of SSD drives. The difference is quite dramatic though - and i'm sorely tempted to buy a couple of more for my other PCs! I don't find games really benefit all that much (i have a small partition for testing it) as loading levels etc seems no different from using my mechanical RAID 0 array - probably due to preloading to the graphics card etc?
Yeah after using an Intel SSD on my main PC, I upgraded all my PCs with Corsair X32s (£90 a pop) - best thing I ever did.
You don't realise how much waiting for the hard drive your PC does until you find everything is much more responsive with a SSD.

..and before anyone says £90 per PC/laptop is a lot … you pay more than that for many upgrades that don't give back as much day to day.
B1scu1T says SSDs are still too expensive