vacancies advertise contact news tip The Vault
facebook rss twitter

BBC Worldwide annual profits up 8 per cent

by Mark Tyson on 16 July 2012, 17:25

Tags: BBC, BBC Multimedia

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qabjpj

Add to My Vault: x

The BBC’s commercial arm, BBC Worldwide, today published its annual review. In the report for the year ending 31st March 2012, revenue was up 5.4 per cent at £1.085 billion for the year and profits up 7.9 per cent at a total of £155 million. The proportion of revenue gathered from digital activities rose a huge 58 per cent compared to last year and contributed 12.8 per cent to group revenue.

headline salesBBC Worldwide is divided into five operating businesses; Channels, Sales & Distribution, Consumer Products, Global Brands and Content & Production. The business monetises BBC content through the following activities:

  • selling finished programmes to broadcasters around the world
  • acquiring them for our own BBC-branded channels
  • publishing to consumers on DVD, download-to-own, or other  forms of electronic ownership  or access
  • building websites, applications and games around the content
  • licensing brands to third parties to turn into consumer products,  such as toys, gifts or clothing
  • re-producing formats and related IP with a local flavour through  international production
  • delivering live events and experiences to fans
  • publishing as books and magazines, some through third-party relationships

The annual review says a large part of the future of BBC Worldwide depends upon driving digital growth, in fact this is the organisation’s number one strategic objective. By 2015 the company aims to deliver 15 per cent of revenue from digital.

Looking at digital activity statistics, the BBC has developed 11 games titles in the last year, 31 million programmes have been downloaded, 25 million apps have been downloaded and the BBC has over 23 million Facebook fans. The report says that “Digital is becoming increasingly important to our industry’s future and is where our consumers, platforms, and devices are heading.” Of course TV show streaming and downloading over the internet is a strong suit for the BBC, “Very strong growth in sales to subscription video-on-demand services (SVOD) has been driven by licensing our content to a host of platforms including Netflix and LOVEFiLM for their UK market debuts. We have also signed video-on-demand (VOD) deals with Rostelcom and Tvigle.ru in Russia, Spiegel in Germany, FetchTV and Quickflix in Australia, Hulu in Japan and Youzee in Spain among others.”

As some areas prove more lucrative, other markets decline and thus BBC Worldwide has decided to exit the BBC Magazines business. Chief Executive, John Smith explained “The decision to exit BBC Magazines came after careful thought. Our Board concluded that its long-term success lay with new owners, who could pursue sector consolidation and emerging format investment with fewer constraints.”Moving away from print to invest more in digital does seem a wise move if you look at the problems many traditional magazine publishing companies are having. The magazine titles sale brought in an extra £121 million to the BBC’s coffers in addition to the £155 million profits declared in the report for this year.



HEXUS Forums :: 11 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
good on them :)
Agreed, fantastic that they can provide quality broadcasting and essentially stop people from needing to watch live television any more and still manage to turn a pretty hefty profit. Although they've dropped about 500 hours of sport last year, that's got to save some cash in licensing?
I'm sorry I think the other posters are confusing this BBC with a different one. Here's my take on it. I'm not trolling, just offering my view.

BBC charges each UK household £145.50 per year. Other countries in Europe can get it free of charge.

Even if you don't watch TV and just own a capable device - you still owe them. No TV, but your landlord has an aerial on the roof? Tough guff - pay up. If I sell you an electrical item (think graphics card or DVD player), I'm required by law to notify licensing so they can chase you up for the money.

BBC claim they don't advertise, hence the license fee. Yet all of their programs get sold to subsidiary companies like UKTV on freeview. These companies then take the shows (UK license payers bought) and fill them with a ton of adverts on Dave and Yesterday.

BBC news is bias. They are the voice of the state and tell us lies. They've told us hurricanes weren't coming and lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. BBC reported the collapse of WTC Building 7 TWICE before it happened. There's a million reasons not to believe their news. I believe the political viewpoint is just to corrupt and biased.

BBC had the funding and manpower to chase up and successfully prosecute 400,000 poor people/license evaders in 2010. Elsewhere we saw massive cuts in public spending, higher tuition fees and the global economic downturn. ….and the best thing they could offer that Christmas was a 5 year old Disney Pixar movie everyone had already seen?

I'm sorry, but BBC tastes like pure nationalistic propaganda to me.
MrBozack
I'm sorry I think the other posters are confusing this BBC with a different one. Here's my take on it. I'm not trolling, just offering my view.

BBC charges each UK household £145.50 per year. Other countries in Europe can get it free of charge.

Even if you don't watch TV and just own a capable device - you still owe them. No TV, but your landlord has an aerial on the roof? Tough guff - pay up. If I sell you an electrical item (think graphics card or DVD player), I'm required by law to notify licensing so they can chase you up for the money.

BBC claim they don't advertise, hence the license fee. Yet all of their programs get sold to subsidiary companies like UKTV on freeview. These companies then take the shows (UK license payers bought) and fill them with a ton of adverts on Dave and Yesterday.

BBC news is bias. They are the voice of the state and tell us lies. They've told us hurricanes weren't coming and lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. BBC reported the collapse of WTC Building 7 TWICE before it happened. There's a million reasons not to believe their news. I believe the political viewpoint is just to corrupt and biased.

BBC had the funding and manpower to chase up and successfully prosecute 400,000 poor people/license evaders in 2010. Elsewhere we saw massive cuts in public spending, higher tuition fees and the global economic downturn. ….and the best thing they could offer that Christmas was a 5 year old Disney Pixar movie everyone had already seen?

I'm sorry, but BBC tastes like pure nationalistic propaganda to me.

MrBozack
BBC news is bias. They are the voice of the state and tell us lies. They've told us hurricanes weren't coming and lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. BBC reported the collapse of WTC Building 7 TWICE before it happened. There's a million reasons not to believe their news. I believe the political viewpoint is just to corrupt and biased.

Hear Hear

Thats why i dont watch the new. Propaganda.

Have you noticed that whenever something major is happening that proves the government are wrong/scum/filthy rotten soundrels, the bbc reports on something to ‘Divert you attention’