facebook rss twitter

BT ordered to block access to 'pirate' download site

by Hugo Jobling on 28 July 2011, 13:28

Tags: British Telecom (LON:BT.A)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qa6ry

Add to My Vault: x

Under blockade

BT has become the first ISP in the UK ordered to block access to a website, on the grounds the site is known to provide links to pirated material. The judgment comes from the High Court, and is the result of a case brought by the Motion Picture Association (MPA) against BT.

The website in question, Newzbin 2, curates links to content found on Usenet, much of which infringes on the copyright of companies represented by the MPA. According to the MPA, BT is fully aware that Newsbin2 is used to infringe copyright and that many of its subscribers access the website, meaning BT should be required to block access on those grounds.

The MPA says that that it has no qualm with BT specifically, but rather only with the activity carried out on its network. Chris Marcich, president and managing director of MPA Europe, stated: "This court action was never an attack on ISPs but we do need their co-operation to deal with the Newzbin site which continually tries to evade the law and judicial sanction. Newzbin is a notorious pirate website which makes hundreds of thousands of copyrighted products available without permission and with no regard for the law."

BT will be using its Clearfield technology, currently used to block websites suspected of hosting content depicting sexual abuse of children, to filter out Newzbin.  Given the ease of circumventing such filters, and the availability of numerous other similar websites, it's unclear what impact this one block will have. However, as the MPA also intends to pursue similar cases against further ISPs, it will no doubt be encouraged by this ruling as it is likely to lead to success in compelling others to take similar action against websites encouraging, and aiding, piracy.



HEXUS Forums :: 19 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Giving the fact that these blocks are usually worthless on the internet and this has just advertised this form of piracy across the internet you've got to wonder what the point of this action was?

Note - I'm not supporting piracy but I think they should be handling this more with a carrot than a stick (I'm still waiting for a spotify like service for TV shows - lovefilm is too expensive and slow for tv series).
Newzbin 2, curates links to content found on Usenet, much of which infringes on the copyright of companies represented by the MPA
There's something I don't get about this - if Newzbin2 is “merely” a Usenet index/search-engine, then surely wouldn't the MPA have been better advised to get BT to block the offending newsgroups? Otherwise - to my simple view at least - the users of Newzbin2 can use Google et al to get a similar result?
Maybe I'm being alarmist, but I've got a sinking suspicion that this might be the first step in portions of the current 'net disappearing as more and more injunctions get filed… :(
cheesemp
Note - I'm not supporting piracy but I think they should be handling this more with a carrot than a stick (I'm still waiting for a spotify like service for TV shows - lovefilm is too expensive and slow for tv series).
What about the Sky (and Virgin) video-on-demand services? I realise that they're probably just as “guilty” as LoveFilm of having high charges (plus those LF bu**ers are never off of my phone, trying to sign me up to a “free” trial, despite me telling them I've got FilmFlex already). Reputedly NetFlix are looking at a possible UK launch - in which case the increased competition has got to be good news?

That said, my use of FF has fallen dramatically since I discovered that the “local” Vue does a good midweek discount - but then again I do still prefer the whole “experience” of the big screen, pop-corn, etc. ;)
Like the MPA and whoever else are going to understand usenet! It's just the usual “PIRACY!!… BAN IT” response.

I'm not particularly bothered in that a lot of usenet firms have firmly positioned themselves as aggregators of illicit material, but what I am slightly bothered by, is how unnerving it is from a net neutrality perspective.
Torrent sites can rightly say they don't store the content, just an index.

Usenet sites do directly host the content, never understood how they get away with that myself, and I can remember when usenet was for text discussion - before web forums ( before web!)
Those “Usenet sites” only host links to content available on usenets. Anyway, keep to the rules and stop talking about usenets! :secret: