facebook rss twitter

Review: ASUS GeForce GTX 465 - Fermi for under £250

by Tarinder Sandhu on 31 May 2010, 08:31 3.0

Tags: GeForce GTX 465, ASUSTeK (TPE:2357)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qayi6

Add to My Vault: x

Final thoughts and rating

Releasedtwo months after the soft launch of the GeForce GTX 480 and GTX 470 GPUs, NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 465's arrival on the same week as COMPUTEX is no surprise.

NVIDIA's taken the GTX 400-series design and calculated how it can reduce the architecture, in light of current yields, to make the GTX 465 a compelling product at a $299 (£230-£250) price point.

Compared to the $349 (£280-£300) GTX 470, the newer card vital stats reveal a 20 per cent drop in theoretical power, with most of the reduction coming from fewer CUDA cores, a narrower memory-bus, and a smaller frame-buffer.

Our benchmarks show that theory does translate into pragmatism, because the GTX 465 trails the GTX 470 by 15-20 per cent in most cases. Looking across to the obvious competitor, Radeon HD 5850, GeForce GTX 465 is, on average, 15 per cent slower at the 1,920x1,200 resolution and 20 per cent at 2,560x1,600.

It's not all doom and gloom, though, because on the plus side, the card's quieter than either the GTX 470/480, and it overclocks well, with our sample hitting 750MHz core and 3,600MHz easily.

NVIDIA is soon to roll out 3DVision support and will continue to bang on the CUDA drum ad nauseam. The GeForce 400-series architecture will also, we believe, look better as time goes on, but, given a budget of <£250 right now, our choice would be the Radeon HD 5850.

NVIDIA's stab at enabling partners to make a sub-$300 GTX 4xx card is compromised by a too-severe cut in performance - just look at the GTX 470 vs. GTX 465 numbers for confirmation. GTX 465 cards need to be closer to £200, all in, to make good sense for the enthusiast.

ASUS' GeForce GTX 465 1,024MB card is based on the reference design but adds in the always-useful SmartDoctor application. Reference-based designs live or die by the underlying architecture, so the ASUS package, whilst decent in itself, is only an average proposition at £230-£250.

Bottom line: NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 465 is a welcome addition to the high-end graphics-card sector. We reckon retail cards will make real sense once super-clocked models are released at sub-£250.

The good

Fermi goodness brought to a lower price point
Architecture shows considerable untapped promise
Quieter than either the GTX 470 and GTX 480 when real-world gaming
ASUS' SmartDoctor application provides some extra overclocking headroom
US pricing ($299) makes the GPU competitive

The not so good

Too-severe an architectural chop for a £250 card, in the UK at least
Radeon HD 5850 is still a better proposition at the same price point
Power-draw characteristics still not ideal

HEXUS Rating

Three
Star

ASUS GeForce GTX 465 1,024MB

HEXUS Where2Buy

TBC.

HEXUS Right2Reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



HEXUS Forums :: 51 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Hexus article
The good
Fermi goodness distilled down

I'm not sure that's in the correct category. ;)
No results from the increases you got when overclocked ?
Underwhelming.

They've set it up to match the 5850 in terms of price, and then failed to beat it in terms of performance. To be honest, it's just continuing in the same disappointing Fermi theme.
More power hungry than an HD5870, more expensive than an HD5850, more a performance rival to the HD5830. Another disappointing Fermi product.
would have been nice if you guys used a non-ref sample from palit or gigabyte