vacancies advertise contact news tip The Vault
facebook rss twitter

Hacker 'fires' up Android 4.0 on Amazon Kindle Fire

by Alistair Lowe on 8 December 2011, 11:52

Tags: Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN), Kindle reader

Quick Link:

Add to My Vault: x

Steven the hacker, to be found at the blog, Steven's Android Apps, has successfully ported Google's Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich OS over to Amazon's Kindle Fire tablet.

Support for WiFi, audio, accelerometer and light sensors is still missing along with, seemingly, elements of hardware optimisation/acceleration, however, this port is massively significant if one considers that the Kindle Fire retails in the US for only $200 (£150 - £200). Currently Amazon actually makes a small loss on each sale of the Kindle Fire, hoping to recuperate costs and turn a profit through book and app sales; this means that a relatively high-spec. tablet device with a dual-core ARM Cortex-A9 CPU, PowerVR SGX540 GPU, 512MB RAM and an IPS panel display, is available at less than cost for purchase.

Until now, the Kindle Fire's exceptionally low costing has naturally been hampered by a highly customised Android 2.3 release, designed to keep users fixed to Amazon's Appstore, preventing the device from being used in any overly flexible manner. Now that Android 4.0 has landed and as the release becomes increasingly stable, users will have a new reason to buy the Kindle Fire. No doubt sales of the tablet will rise from this announcement, though, with Amazon making a loss on each tablet sold that doesn't keep to its original firmware, we wonder exactly what the e-tailer's response to the situation will be.

For the interested, below is a brief video of Android 4.0 running on the Kindle Fire.


HEXUS Forums :: 4 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Grrr, even Hexus articles are starting to get the “duel-core” typos :(
Yes, there are two cores; they fight to see who gets to process the most
I doubt they'll be that bothered. Lets face it less than 5% will be flashed like this and even those are 1)Reducing overall cost of manufacture (more built cheaper it is 2) Preventing sales of competitor devices. Saying that I expect they'll do little changes to keep the flashing limited to techies.
I love these articles. Sites get all excited about a version of Android being ported to some device it's not supposed to be on - and then you learn that most of the core features of the device don't actuall work.

It's not really a ‘successful port’ if you can't use Wi-Fi, is it?