facebook rss twitter

Review: Corsair Force F100 SSD - SandForce-powered performance

by Tarinder Sandhu on 26 April 2010, 05:00 4.0

Tags: Corsair Force F100 SSD, Corsair

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaxyj

Add to My Vault: x

Testing methodology


Storage drive Corsair Force F100 Crucial RealSSD C300 Intel X25-M G2 Corsair Nova V128 Corsair Extreme X128 OCZ Vertex Seagate Barracuda XT 2TB
Drive capacity 100GB 256GB 160GB 128GB 128GB 128GB 2,000GB
Drive firmware 0.2 1.0 02HD 1.0 1.0 1.30 CC12
Approx. price at time of writing £320 £547 £352 £293 £293 £295 £215
Approx price per GB 3.20
2.14
2.2
2.29
2.29
2.30
0.107
CPU Intel Core i7 965 Extreme Edition (3.20GHz, 8MB L3 cache, quad-core, LGA1366 - Turbo Boost on)
Motherboard ASUS P6X58D Premium
BIOS revision 0703
Memory 6GB Crucial DDR3-1,066
Host hard drive Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB
Graphics Card Sapphire Radeon HD 5850 1,024MB
Mainboard software Intel 9.1.1.1025 and RST 9.6
Graphics driver Catalyst 10.2
PSU Corsair HX1000
Operating System Windows 7 Ultimate, 64-bit

Tests

Benchmarks CrystalDiskMark 3.0 beta 3
Iometer 2008.06-22 - database and workstation profiles (QD two and 32)
HD Tach 3.0.1.0
PCMark Vantage 1.0.2.0
File copy test  (8.83GB, 544 files)
Windows 7 booting test
Crysis level-loading test (train) 

Setup notes

To give some idea of basic performance, we're comparing the Corsair F100 against the also-speedy Crucial RealSSD C300 and Intel's X25-M G2 SSDs. Throwing in a couple of further 128GB SSDs from Corsair - Nova V128 and X128 - along with OCZ's Vertex, we have a trio of compared drives featuring the Indilinx controller. We've also added in a 2TB mechanical HDD from Seagate for good measure, too.

Firmware 0.2 was used for the Corsair Force F100, together with the latest available for the other drives. We used the garbage collection tool on the Vertex before benchmarking.

We use a Seagate 1TB mechanical hard drive, and it houses the operating system. The benchmarked drives are connected to the motherboard's ICH10R 3Gbps controller should they use SATA2, or the Marvell 6Gbps connector if they're SATA3. All are used as secondary/storage mediums for the first five tests.

Iometer is run by using workstation and database patterns for queue depths (outstanding I/Os) of two and 32, representing very light and moderate loads. Drives with efficient NCQ functions will see performance increase as the queue is deepened. 

CrystalDiskMark provides throughput data based on sequential reads and writes, and random (512K/4K) reads and writes. We've used the default 1,000MB file-size for the tests.

PCMark Vantage spits out a bunch of data on the relative speed of the drive(s) when undertaking common tasks.

The file copy test involves copying 8.83GB of data back on to a different folder on the same partition, stressing the read/write ability of the drive.

HD Tach's full variable-zone read/write test is used to write to the drive(s)' blocks and therefore bring the benefits efficient garbage recycling into play. We run this test first to mimic the wear a drive is likely to have during day-to-day operations.

Copying an exact image on to the test drives and using them as the main boot storage, we time how long it takes to load Windows 7 and, once within the operating system, the train level within Crysis, as used in our graphics-card tests.