facebook rss twitter

Kingston SSDNow V+ 64GB SSD review.

by Tarinder Sandhu on 19 October 2009, 10:00 3.5

Tags: SSDNow V+ 64GB, Kingston

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaud6

Add to My Vault: x

CrystalDiskMark

CrystalDiskMark sequential read speed
MB/s, higher is better
Crucial CT64M225 SSD 64GBSamsung HD103UJ 1TBCorsair X128 SSD 128GBKingston SSDNow V+ 64GB
200.9108.1251.3222.6


CrystalDiskMark sequential write speed
MB/s, higher is better
Crucial CT64M225 SSD 64GBSamsung HD103UJ 1TBCorsair X128 SSD 128GBKingston SSDNow V+ 64GB
93.1198.63146.9145.7


CrystalDiskMark random read speed (512K)
MB/s, higher is better
Crucial CT64M225 SSD 64GBSamsung HD103UJ 1TBCorsair X128 SSD 128GBKingston SSDNow V+ 64GB
153.744.61182.6179.1


CrystalDiskMark random write speed (512K)
MB/s, higher is better
Crucial CT64M225 SSD 64GBSamsung HD103UJ 1TBCorsair X128 SSD 128GBKingston SSDNow V+ 64GB
89.9675.4144.9113.1


CrystalDiskMark random read speed (4K)
MB/s, higher is better
Crucial CT64M225 SSD 64GBSamsung HD103UJ 1TBCorsair X128 SSD 128GBKingston SSDNow V+ 64GB
27.630.6229.6723.9


CrystalDiskMark random write speed (4K)
MB/s, higher is better
Crucial CT64M225 SSD 64GBSamsung HD103UJ 1TBCorsair X128 SSD 128GBKingston SSDNow V+ 64GB
11.21.9517.896.1


Look at the performance of the two 64GB drives and we're really comparing a Samsung controller against the Indilinx in the Crucial.

Kingston's SSDNow V+ is hotter for large-file transfers, both read and write, but the Crucial does better for random small-file reads and writes.