facebook rss twitter

Review: G.SKILL vs. Crucial: high-speed DDR3 showdown

by Tarinder Sandhu on 16 May 2008, 06:15

Tags: Crucial Technology (NASDAQ:MU)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qanab

Add to My Vault: x

System setup and notes


HEXUS test PC and memory specs

Memory G.SKILL F3-12800CL7D-2GB Crucial BL12864BE2009
Memory speed and timings 1,600MHz, 7-7-7-18 2T 2,000MHz, 9-9-9-28 2T
CPU Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 @ 3,200MHz and 1,600MHz bus speed
Motherboard eVGA nForce 790i Ultra SLI
BIOS revision P04 (18/04/2008)
Graphics Card BFG GeForce 9800 GTX 512MiB
Disk drive(s) Seagate 160GB SATAII (ST3160812AS)
Mainboard software ForceWare 9.64
Graphics driver ForceWare 174.14
PSU Corsair HX1000W
Operating System Windows Vista Business 64-bit
Approx price at time of writing £165 £340

Tests

2D benchmarks ScienceMark 2.0 memory bandwidth
ScienceMark 2.0 memory latency
CPU-Z latency
SiSoft Sandra XII Lite Win64 memory bandwidth
HEXUS DivX 6.61 encoding

3D Benchmarks Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts, DX9, 1024x768
Enemy Territory: Quake Wars, OpenGL, 1024x768

Setup notes

We've run an Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 at its native 3.2GHz and 1.6GHz FSB, on top of an eVGA nForce 790i Ultra SLI motherboard.

In order for a fair comparison, we needed to reach the modules' rated frequencies with identical clock and FSB speeds, hence the use of different FSB-to-memory ratios in the BIOS - 1:2 for the G.SKILL and 4:10 for the Crucial Ballistix - whilst keeping the overall clock frequency the same.

The primary question that requires answering, we suppose, is if the more-expensive Crucial's higher speed is performance-mitigated by its higher (read slower) timings. In short, is it worth paying double for a 2GHz-clocked pair?

We'll then indulge in some module overclocking with varying timings.

Got all that? If not, hit the HEXUS.community and ask away.