facebook rss twitter

Review: ATI Radeon X1650 PRO 3-way shootout

by Ryszard Sommefeldt on 4 October 2006, 08:59

Tags: ATi Technologies (NYSE:AMD)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qagwa

Add to My Vault: x

Systems setup and notes

Hardware

System ATI Radeon X16xxs NVIDIA GeForce 7600s
Processor Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 (2.40GHz, 4MiB L2 cache, LGA775)
Motherboard ASUS P5W DH Deluxe NVIDIA nForce 590 SLI Reference
Memory 1GiB (2 x 512) OCZ PC2-5400
Memory timings and speed 4-4-4-8 2T @ 667MHz (PC5400)
Graphics card(s) Sapphire Radeon X1650 PRO 256MB (594/693)
GeCube Radeon X1650 PRO GDDR3 256MB (600/747)
HIS Radeon X1650 PRO IceQ Turbo 256MB (621/693)

GeCube Radeon X1600 PRO 256MB (500/400)
HIS Radeon X1600 XT IceQ Turbo 256MB (600/700)
NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT 256MB (560/700)
NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS 256MB (400/400)
Disk drive(s) Seagate 160GB 7200.9 SATA 3Gbps
BIOS revision 1305 28/06/06
Mainboard software Intel Inf Update 8.0.1.1002 NVIDIA Platform Driver 6.70
Graphics driver CATALYST 6.8 NVIDIA Forceware 91.33
Operating System Windows XP Professional, w/ SP2, 32-bit

Software

3D Benchmarks Far Cry v1.33
Quake 4 v1.04
Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory

Notes

We performed all benchmark tests wearing emergency hats. That's a lie, but I promised a friend I'd use the phrase "emergency hats" in an article.

The usual bits apply here. We ran each benchmark a trio of times, discarding the outer results and reporting the middle one. If any of the three results looked erroneous, we threw all three away until we could collect three within a margin of statistical error. Any major attempts needed to get three reliable results we let you know about, of course. Apart from that, things are as noted on the graphs and in the graph commentary. Want to know more? Hit up the fantastic, awesome, entirely gorgeous HEXUS.community. You know it makes sense, etc, etc.