facebook rss twitter

Review: Sapphire Radeon X1600 XT Ultimate Edition 256MB

by Tarinder Sandhu on 8 June 2006, 03:41

Tags: Sapphire Radeon X1600 XT, Sapphire

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qafxe

Add to My Vault: x

System setup and notes

Hardware and Software

Test Platforms

System HEXUS Midrange ATI Platform HEXUS Midrange NVIDIA Platform
Processor(s) AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ S939 (2.0GHz, 2 x 512KiB L2 cache, dual-core) AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ S939 (2.0GHz, 2 x 512KiB L2 cache, dual-core)
Mainboard ASUS A8R32-MVP. ATI CrossFire Xpress 3200 ASUS A8N32-SLI Deluxe, nForce4 SLI X16
Chipset driver ATI Catalyst 6.3 NVIDIA 9.32
BIOS revision 0404 1103
Memory 1GByte (2 x 512MByte) OCZ4001024V25DC-K PC3200 1GByte (2 x 512MByte) OCZ4001024V25DC-K PC3200
Memory speed and timings 2.5-4-4-8 2T @ 400MHz 2.5-4-4-8 2T @ 400MHz
Graphics card Sapphire Radeon X1600 XT Ultimate Edition 256MB (semi-passive) P.O.V GeForce 7600 GS Silent 256MB (completely passive)
Graphics card driver ATI CCC 6.3 NVIDIA ForceWare 84.21
Disk drive Seagate 160GB SATA Seagate 160GB SATA
Monitor (tested with) Dell 2405FPW Widescreen 24in TFT Dell 2405FPW Widescreen 24in TFT
Operating system Windows XP Pro SP2 Windows XP Pro SP2


Benchmark Software

Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory v1.05 - HEXUS custom benchmark
Quake 4 v1.04 HEXUS custom benchmark
Far Cry v1.33 - HEXUS custom benchmark

Notes

We'll be comparing the Sapphire card's performance against a P.O.V (Point Of View) card based on NVIDIA's GeForce 7600 GS GPU. It's a completely passive design that retails for around £20 less than the Sapphire card, and it runs at 400MHz core and 800MHz (effective) memory, so please, please bear that in mind when comparing the performance results on the following pages.

We've run our gaming benchmarks with medium detail and at 1280x1024 and 1600x1200. The lower resolution is tested with 4x antialiasing and 8x anisotropic filtering. At 1600x1200 we run with no AA but with the same 8x AF.