vacancies advertise contact news tip The Vault
facebook rss twitter

Review: Crucial Radeon 9700 Pro

by Tarinder Sandhu on 26 October 2002, 00:00

Tags: Crucial Radeon 9700 PRO, Crucial Technology (NASDAQ:MU)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qant

Add to My Vault: x

System setup, notes, overclocking

 

Here's a quick rundown of the test system should you wish to compare benchmark results with your own.
  • Intel Pentium4 2800MHz S478 Northwood CPU
  • ABIT IT7-MAX i845E run in unsupported DDR356 modes (A4 BIOS)
  • Crucial Radeon 9700 Pro at 324/621 (stock) and 353/652 (o/c)
  • NVIDIA reference GeForce4 Ti 4600 (300/648)

Common components

  • 256MB Corsair XMS3200 C2 run at 2-5-2-2 at asynchronous 178MHz memory mode with enhance on.
  • Western Digital 120JB 120GB Hard Drive.
  • Liteon 16x DVD
  • Samcheer 420w PSU
  • D-Link 530FX NIC
  • 17" Sony E230 FD monitor
  • 18" Samsung 181T TFT
  • Alpha 8942 cooler

Software

  • Windows XP Professional Build 2600.xpclient.010817-1148
  • Intel 4.00.109 chipset drivers
  • Intel application accelerator drivers
  • Plutonium XP Drivers (based on the Catalyst 2.3 set (6166))
  • Detonator XP 40.41 drivers
  • 3DMark 2001SE
  • Codecreatures Pro benchmark
  • Quake 3
  • Serious Sam 2 Demo
  • Unreal Tournament 2003 Demo

Notes

I'll be conducting all benchmarks at 1024x768, 1280x1024, and 1600x1200x32 respectively. Vertical synch' is disabled, and graphical options are set to best quality. I've changed the driver set for the Plutonium XP drivers based on ATI's 6166 set. I've also negated including the reference Radeon 9700 Pro due to the fact that it operates at exactly the same speed as the Crucial Radeon 9700 Pro. In fact, installing one card or the other made no difference to Windows XP, it considered them identical. Running a number of benchmarks on both at stock speeds resulted in extremely similar results. The differences between the two were down to the standard deviation of the benchmark and not to differences in hardware.

2D

The Radeon range of video cards have impressed all with the clarity of their 2D. It's of no surprise that the Crucial Radeon 9700 exhibited excellent 2D on both a Sony 17" FD Trinitron monitor (via VGA) and a Samsung 181T LCD (via DVI). Text and images were crisp, clear, and eminently readable on both displays.

Video playback, whether it be from a DVD or DivX source, was crisp and smooth, just as one would expect. I would have no hesitation in recommending the Crucial Radeon 9700 Pro if clarity and multimedia playback was high on your priorities list.

Hydravision

Hydravision, ATI's dual display program, was a doddle to setup. With dual inputs (albeit DVI and VGA), I was able to connect 2 displays effortlessly. The configuration screen allows you to manipulate various settings. You can either have the desktop stretched over two screens or mirrored on both (as shown below).

Overclocking

After hearing a number of reports that this particular Radeon 9700 Pro boasted a higher memory clock-speed than most, I was eager to put that rumour to the test. Firing up Rage3D tweak utility, this is what it found.

That's exactly the same speed as all reference R9700s. Although equipped with 2.86ns memory (700MHz DDR), this particular Crucial R9700 is clocked at a modest 621MHz DDR for the memory and 324MHz for the core.

Using a number of card-taxing benchmarks, I tried to discover how high this card could go on a long-term basis. With a lot of trial and error, I arrived at a safe overclock of 353MHz core and 326MHz memory (652MHz DDR). Sure, it would benchmark higher on a single run, but long-term stability was poor above the quoted figures. This is how Rage3D saw it.

I must qualify this by stating that the card was in a standard PC case with no additional cooling. Running it on a test bench with a fan exclusively pointed at it would have given me a higher overclock, but that would not have been indicative of real-world performance.

Anyway, on to the benchmarks.