facebook rss twitter

Review: Sapphire Radeon HD 4890 XT and XFX Radeon HD 4890 OC XXX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

by Tarinder Sandhu on 2 April 2009, 05:00 3.7

Tags: Radeon HD 4890 XT 1GB (Sapphire) 9.4, AMD (NYSE:AMD), Sapphire, ATi Technologies (NYSE:AMD), NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA), XFX (HKG:1079), PC

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaroh

Add to My Vault: x

GeForce GTX 275 - what's the recipe?

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 896MB

An historical note

ATI's method of increasing single-GPU performance has been in adding a clock-speed jump to Radeon HD 4870. Looking at recent history, NVIDIA went down a different design route that has origins in age-old GeForce 8800 GTX, characterised by a large transistor budget and, at the time, irreproachable performance.

The latest derivation(s) of that excellent design is the GeForce 200-series, currently headlined by the single-GPU GeForce GTX 285 1,024MB that's etailing for around £300. Then there's the real monster, twin-GPU GeForce GTX 295, costing £400 or so. Point is, NVIDIA's 'big' design means that it has consummate single-GPU horsepower, better than ATI's, but at the inevitable cost of a more-expensive card that's, obviously, pricier to produce. ATI Radeon HD 4870 1,024MB is £165, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 1,024MB is £300: go figure.

But NVIDIA's brought down GT200 goodness to the mainstream, in the form of the GTX 260, currently costing £160. It's a decent-performing, value-for-money card, but there's an obvious gap between it and the next rung up, GTX 285. That's where the 'all-new' GeForce GTX 275 rolls in, taking a bit of both.

Recipe: a pinch of GTX 260 and a smidgeon of GTX 285

So how to engineer a part that fits in-between the GTX 260 and GTX 285? Simple, take a bit of both, mix, and deliver. Let's bring out another table....