vacancies advertise contact news tip The Vault
facebook rss twitter

Review: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT and Radeon RX 6800

by Tarinder Sandhu on 18 November 2020, 14:01

Tags: AMD (NYSE:AMD)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaepl4

Add to My Vault: x

Ray Tracing and GPGPU

Our performance investigations thus far have revolved around rasterisation performance. Rightfully so, as the vast majority of games use rasterisation exclusively to render visuals.

The RDNA 2 architecture's provision for ray tracing makes comparisons against Nvidia's RT Cores interesting and relevant.

3DMark Port Royal shows AMD is somewhat behind Nvidia in a rasterisation-plus-ray tracing approach. Looking at pure ray tracing through the recent DXR test from Futuremark paints a bleaker picture as Nvidia's RT Cores enjoy a commanding advantage over AMD's - RTX 3080 is almost twice as fast as RX 6800 XT.

What actually matters is in-game performance in a well-coded game. We examine this by running Control at QHD with ray tracing set to high. Performance isn't close between comparison pairs. RTX 3080 is a whopping 49 per cent faster than RX 6800 XT. RTX 3070 is over 20 per cent faster than RX 6800, and that's without taking DLSS 2.0 into account, which further increases Nvidia's framerate lead. You're not buying Radeon RX 6800 Series for immediate ray tracing prowess.

Looking at a couple of GPGPU benchmarks, Nvidia's latest architecture remains faster.