facebook rss twitter

Kingston launches HyperX 12GB DDR3 memory pack

by Tarinder Sandhu on 16 November 2009, 16:00

Tags: Kingston

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qauvd

Add to My Vault: x

Look, ma, I got me 12GB



Look, ma, I've got me 12GB of DDR3 memory on a Gigabyte X58-UD5 motherboard.



There's something satisfying about seeing server-like memory capacities on a home PC.

The XMP settings are such that the motherboard didn't flinch when changing memory from a 3GB DDR3 1,066MHz CL7 kit to the six-module Kingston - it really is plug and play.


Booting up at almost the correct latencies - in fact, CPU-Z reads it incorrectly on this motherboard - the modules passed a one-hour burn-in test without issue.


Timings can be tightened if running at lower frequencies.

The why

The focus of memory-module manufacturers towards larger-capacity kits can be reasoned many ways. Firstly, the large L3 cache on Core i7 chips does much of the 'heavy lifting', meaning that faster, more-expensive DDR3 doesn't provide as much of a performance benefit as on, say, Intel Core 2. Secondly, pricing has come down to the extent where it's possible to justify 12GB of RAM on a very high-end system.

Kingston's KHX1600C9D3K6/12GX kit is aimed at the extreme (home) user who, for example, runs huge files through Photoshop whilst multi-tasking to the hilt.

What we're going to investigate in an upcoming review is whether having 12GB of RAM provides a tangible benefit over 6GB or even 3GB on a Core i7 LGA1366 system, especially when we throw memory-hungry programs at Windows 7. Stay tuned for that.


HEXUS Forums :: 6 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Damn, to think I could be twice as extreme as I am now. In fact, that makes me nothing short of ordinary.

I am ashamed :(
Haha that must sting like a bitch dude :)
I thought my 8GB DDR3 on my x48 was silly, saying that I got them at Ā£20.99 per 2GB and its crucial 1333mhz stuff.

Still six of them would be a lot cheaper than this kit, is the extra bandwidth actually used?
I'm surprised bigger ram is not more common. It seems like PCs everywhere are still held back by the fact that most can only make use of 3gb due to being on a 32 bit OS. I've had about 2gb in my PC for several years now. I think I got 1.5gb ram in late 2004, up to 2gb early 2005 and just 3gb now in nearly 2010. Doesn't feel like much progress.
2Gb in 2005 was a beast of an amount though. I remember 512Mb was the norm back in 2003/04 and it was creeping up to 1Gb in 2004/05. 2Gb was a lot of ram back then!