facebook rss twitter

Dark Days for Usenet

by Alistair Lowe on 8 November 2011, 16:04

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qa7x3

Add to My Vault: x

Following straight after a report on British music industry attacks against Pirate Bay, we now hear that Amsterdam-based Dutch Usenet provider News Service has been effectively ordered to close down operations after Dutch courts commanded the service to cease 'recording and offering material protected by copyright and neighbouring rights' less it face penalty payments.

The legal case had been launched two years ago by BREIN, an anti-piracy Dutch uber-foundation, formed from other groups such as the MPA, looking to promote anti-piracy laws and their enforcement. Though the fine details are not fully known, at least back in 2010, the Usenet provider should have been protected by Article 6:196c of the Dutch Civil Code, based on European e-commerce directives, which very clearly, even through translation, state that information service providers are not liable for the information they transmit. Perhaps times are changing as even News Service's on-line Notice and Takedown (NTD) procedure, allowing for the removal of copyright material per request, proved ineffective in the courts.

To be clear, News Service had not actually been ordered to close down but to stop recording and distributing copyright infringing content. Unlike in the recent Newzbin case, where as a search provider, Newzbin had been requested to remove special and focused indexing of TV and movie content, quite reasonably the Dutch Usenet provider had no choice but to appeal the court's request as it is not involved in the processing or detection of what types of content pass through its servers, making the request technically infeasible. The appeal was sadly declined on November 4, 2011, a precedent-setting decision that could have serious ramifications in future cases.

Dark days indeed for Usenet providers around the world.



HEXUS Forums :: 5 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
as terrible as this is for freedoms, usenet is pretty much primarily a warez source, even if it wasn't designed as that it is commonly accepted as that

the fight against piracy has come way way way too late in the game so the law needs to resort to “dirty” tactics to stem the flow
Tunnah
as terrible as this is for freedoms, usenet is pretty much primarily a warez source, even if it wasn't designed as that it is commonly accepted as that

the fight against piracy has come way way way too late in the game so the law needs to resort to “dirty” tactics to stem the flow

I think the core issue here is that Usenet servers around the world all mirror the content of one another. There are many legitimate uses of these servers, both in text and binary form, all of which will be damaged by irresponsible legal requests.
Scribe
There are many legitimate uses of these servers, both in text and binary form, all of which will be damaged by irresponsible legal requests.

Or indeed by irresponsible illegal usage. A shame any innocent users have to suffer the consequences of the actions of idiots, but that's the way in so many walks of life.
kalniel
Or indeed by irresponsible illegal usage. A shame any innocent users have to suffer the consequences of the actions of idiots, but that's the way in so many walks of life.

This is true, though I've always found it a difficult subject. This issue of backup copies of software vs illegal redistribution, the matter that some content is illegal in one country but not another, stringent T&Cs in digital products for personal usage and so on. For me this is why it is important not to hold the service provider directly responsible and resolve these debates in a more open and public manner, until more acceptable and clean-cut laws are in place.
kalniel
Or indeed by irresponsible illegal usage. A shame any innocent users have to suffer the consequences of the actions of idiots, but that's the way in so many walks of life.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackstone's_formulation

A principle sadly lost on highly authoritarian contemporary bureaucrats.