facebook rss twitter

Opinion: What AGEIA deal means for AMD

by Scott Bicheno on 8 February 2008, 10:24


Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qalnb

Add to My Vault: x

Why did NVIDIA buy AGEIA?

So why the NVIDIA buyout? The press release, demonstrating once more NVIDIA’s love of capital letters, said “PhysX on GeForce Will Bring Amazing Physics Dynamics to Millions of Gamers.” This strongly implies that they intend to put a PhysX chip on some or all of their graphics cards. We reckon, however, that the smart move might be to put it in the mainboard chipset instead. This could resolve the chicken-and-egg situation as now the customer will automatically have PhysX whenever they buy an NVIDIA board and developers will be reassured by a much larger install-base of that technology.

This may well also give consumers an additional reason to buy NVIDIA mainboards as, even if there aren’t many games requiring PhysX out now, they will at least be future-proofing their PCs to some extent.

So this is the only competitive advantage NVIDIA has bought itself over AMD in the short term. But if, and it definitely is an if, it does succeed in catalysing demand for improved physics processing, then the victory will be considerably greater.

From AMD’s point of view this is definitely a setback. However, it must also reside near the bottom of its fire-fighting priority list. In the GPU space it needs to start giving NVIDIA a regular run for its money before it starts worrying about other technologies. But the number one priority has to be where the main volume of PC sales occurs – the cheap-and-cheerful laptop sector (see below), where Intel currently dominates. If AMD doesn’t address these markets effectively then the game could be over long before physics becomes a major factor.

£269laptopSign of the times: a £269 laptop with your baked beans


Related reading: Dell axes AMD consumer range

HEXUS Forums :: 2 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
I don't think its such a big deal for AMD, they can invest in open source alternatives such as ODE or Sony's Bullet, or just bypass it all with a Physics Abstraction Layer (pal.sourceforge.net).
I have to say, I like the idea of putting it on the chipset. In my opinion, their motherboard need more than SLi (not entirely unique to their board anywa) to differentiate from the competition.