facebook rss twitter

Sandy Bridge IGPs show huge performance-boost

by Pete Mason on 31 August 2010, 12:35

Tags: Intel (NASDAQ:INTC)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qazs4

Add to My Vault: x

When Intel boasted that its upcoming processors - based on the Sandy Bridge architecture - would feature massively-improved graphics performance, few believed that the results would be anything to write home about.  However, it seems like the company has been doing its homework, and it might just be enough to put the pressure on IGPs from other manufacturers.

Firstly, IDG is reporting that the graphics-cores will feature support for 3D Blu-ray.  While current-generation processors with integrated graphics are able to decode 1080p video, the step-up to 3D will require a significant increase in processing power.

However, Blu-ray drives on computers are still relatively rare and 3D in general is quite niche, making the actual feature of limited use.

Tests on an early sample by Anandtech, though, show that the improved graphical-horsepower can be used for more than just watching films.  Using a 3.1GHz Core i5 2400K with a ‘single-core' integrated-GPU, the Intel chip traded blows with a discrete ATI Radeon HD 5450, beating it by up to 10 per cent in some games.  

Admittedly, the graphical-fidelity was decreased and the resolution was low.  However, the new processor still decimated other current-generation IGPs - from both Intel and AMD - and produced playable frame-rates in every game that was tested.  For a product with plenty more development time before it ships, those results are certainly encouraging.

The CPU tested by Anandtech was an early sample, so the performance could change before it's released.  However, it is clear that, after years of neglect, Intel is finally taking its integrated graphics seriously and could prove a real threat to AMD and NVIDIA's offerings.



HEXUS Forums :: 19 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
I can't believe how overhyped this has been. Hexus's own review of the 5450 wasn't pretty with the evaluation of…

If the primary concern when purchasing a graphics card is to play games, then do yourself a favour and spent an extra £10-£15 for either a Radeon HD 4670 or GeForce GT 220.

Instead of celebrating this “achievement” intel should be damned for once again failing to provide acceptable gaming performance. They could do an awful lot better.

http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=22120&page=6

Llano is likely to offer 4670 or better performance for less cost.
Jimbo75
I can't believe how overhyped this has been. Hexus's own review of the 5450 wasn't pretty with the evaluation of…



Instead of celebrating this “achievement” intel should be damned for once again failing to provide acceptable gaming performance. They could do an awful lot better.

http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=22120&page=6

Llano is likely to offer 4670 or better performance for less cost.

All with a relatively crap CPU.
If you mean Llano will be crap, I respectfully disagree. It won't be an SB beater but it could get close to say the i7 920 in a lot of things.

It will also thrash any intel cpu in gpgpu, one of the main points of the chip and Fusion in general.
Jimbo75
If you mean Llano will be crap, I respectfully disagree. It won't be an SB beater but it could get close to say the i7 920 in a lot of things.

It will also thrash any intel cpu in gpgpu, one of the main points of the chip and Fusion in general.

But as i said, relatively the CPU is essentially a PII (IIRC) and if the user was serious about GPGPU, they would be using a dedicated GPU above and beyond the capability of a 4670, so for me personally this is a moot point.
Well what about simple stuff like speeding up webpages using D2D? Most of us spent a lot of time on the web and it's still stuck like it was 10 years ago, with very little changes.

http://blogs.amd.com/fusion/2010/06/24/graphics-acceleration-not-just-for-games/

If intel wasn't so big they'd have been left behind years ago. As it is the web will probably always have to cater for people with backward intel igp's like the one on SB.