facebook rss twitter

Review: Corsair Force F120 SSD - new formula for a fast drive

by Tarinder Sandhu on 17 June 2010, 08:58 4.0

Tags: Force F120, Corsair

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qayql

Add to My Vault: x

How we test

Storage drive Corsair Force F120 Corsair Force F100 Crucial RealSSD C300 Intel X25-M G2 Corsair Nova V128 Corsair Extreme X128 OCZ Vertex Seagate Barracuda XT 2TB
Drive capacity 120GB 100GB 256GB 160GB 128GB 128GB 128GB 2,000GB
Drive firmware 30CA13F0 0.2 1.0 02HD 1.0 1.0 1.30 CC12
Approx. price at time of writing £299 £320 £580 £328 £260 £275 £268 £215
Approx price per GB 2.49
3.20
2.27
2.05
2.03
2.15
2.09
0.107
CPU Intel Core i7 965 Extreme Edition (3.20GHz, 8MB L3 cache, quad-core, LGA1366 - Turbo Boost on)
Motherboard ASUS P6X58D Premium
BIOS revision 0703
Memory 6GB Crucial DDR3-1,066
Host hard drive Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB
Graphics Card Sapphire Radeon HD 5850 1,024MB
Mainboard software Intel 9.1.1.1025 and RST 9.6
Graphics driver Catalyst 10.2
PSU Corsair HX1000
Operating System Windows 7 Ultimate, 64-bit

Tests

Benchmarks HD Tach 3.0.1.0 RW
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 beta 3
Iometer 2008.06-22 - database and workstation profiles (QD two and 32)
PCMark Vantage 1.0.2.0
File copy test  (8.83GB, 544 files)
Windows 7 booting test
Crysis level-loading test (train) 

Setup notes

To give some idea of basic performance, we're comparing the Corsair F120 against the F100 model, the also-speedy Crucial RealSSD C300 and Intel's X25-M G2 SSDs. Throwing in a couple of further 128GB SSDs from Corsair - Nova V128 and X128 - along with OCZ's Vertex, we have a trio of compared drives featuring the Indilinx controller. We've also added in a 2TB mechanical HDD from Seagate for good measure, too. Firmware 30CA13F0 was used for the Corsair Force F120

We use a Seagate 1TB mechanical hard drive, housing the operating system. The benchmarked drives are connected to the motherboard's ICH10R 3Gbps controller should they use SATA2, or the Marvell 6Gbps connector if they're SATA3. All are used as secondary/storage mediums for the first five tests.

HD Tach's full variable-zone read/write test is used to write to the drive(s)' blocks and therefore bring the benefits efficient garbage recycling into play. We run this test first to mimic the wear a drive is likely to have during day-to-day operations.

CrystalDiskMark provides throughput data based on sequential reads and writes, and random (512K/4K) reads and writes. We've used the default 1,000MB file-size for the tests.

Iometer is run by using workstation and database patterns for queue depths (outstanding I/Os) of two and 32, representing very light and moderate loads. Drives with efficient NCQ functions will see performance increase as the queue is deepened. 

PCMark Vantage spits out a bunch of data on the relative speed of the drive(s) when undertaking common tasks.

The file copy test involves copying 8.83GB of data back on to a different folder on the same partition, stressing the read/write ability of the drive.

Copying an exact image on to the test drives and using them as the main boot storage, we time how long it takes to load Windows 7 and, once within the operating system, the train level within Crysis, as used in our graphics-card tests.