facebook rss twitter

QOTW: How would you change NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 690?

by Parm Mann on 4 May 2012, 16:47

Tags: NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qabf7z

Add to My Vault: x

Whichever way you look at it, NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 690 is, quite simply, the world's fastest graphics card.

It's a ferocious beast designed primarily to satiate the needs of die-hard gamers with big wallets and even bigger appetites. We're talking the best part of 100 frames per second in DX11 titles such as Batman: Arkham City without so much as breaking a sweat.

The card has a pair of big cojones, there's no doubt about that, but is it all things to all men? As much as NVIDIA would want to convince you otherwise, no product is perfect and the dizzying £850+ price tag is a major bone of contention. And there's also a small matter of available games - is there anything out there right now that's so gobsmackingly beautiful that it cries out for this much muscle? Or is a GTX 690 wasted amid a sea of PC games that are, in most cases, little more than console ports?

Begs the question, would you have done it differently? Is a 2GB frame buffer per GPU shortsighted? Will a card as extreme as this serve only to make high-end PC gaming a niche past time? Or has NVIDIA hit the nail on the head with a truly top-notch solution? Share your thoughts in the comments below.



HEXUS Forums :: 16 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
I'd drop the price by about 500 quid, then I'd buy one today :D

As it is with a kid on the way, I think my days of buying expensive graphics cards (which to me means anything over £200… this price is astronomical) are over :(
I'd remove the second gpu so we don't have to suffer stuff like this -


http://ht4u.net/reviews/2012/nvidia_geforce_gtx_690_im_test/index3.php

Dual cards are awful and will remain awful until microstutter is cured.
To me this kind of halo card is almost a proof-of-prinicple rather than practical design; by definition it is very high end and so asking what us mere mortals would like to see in it is a bit moot. To the majority, it is something to covet but we'll end up settling for something further down the rankings for now (even if that is 1x 680) with the option of adding another in SLI when the prices drop/as a future upgrade.

Meanwhile, what are the real world applications (other than obscure automated trading/financial gubbins) this beast is suited to (research? demonstration set-ups for other products or museum type interactive exhibits?)? For display PCs (as in ones to demonstrate things to people, not for personal use and the potential budget would be greater) - would this be comfortable running 3 reasonably large screens in 3D? It'd be a grand way to show off a new FPS or similar game and a stand showing that would have my attention before I even knew what it was showing.
aside from the microstutter issue the twin 560ti's were a nice idea, if they had more RAM. So more ram per card, especially at the resolutions these are meant to be used at, and work on the microstutter, i'm not sure if adaptive v-synch will help here or not.
IMHO yes it is :) better be with one piece of GTX 690 (price,watt,noise) rather than dual/SLI GTX 680.