facebook rss twitter

Home-grown open-source video Codec to save BBC millions and make possible 'universal access'

by Bob Crabtree on 12 June 2005, 00:00

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qabh4

Add to My Vault: x

BBC R&D Open Days - first report

The Dirac video Codec created by BBC R&D and co-developed since early 2004 with open-source programmers is set to remove one massive barrier to making available on the internet all BBC TV output – by saving the corporation very many millions of pounds in streaming license fees in coming years.

If development of the Codec continues at the current pace, it's possible that in as little as six months the BBC will be able to start switching its streaming output away from the expensive proprietary systems it currently uses - Real and, more recently, Microsoft.

Demonstrations at this week's BBC R&D open days of the Codec – named after the Nobel-prize-winning British physicist Paul Dirac - showed it capable of delivering quality at least as good as MPEG-2 and WM9, and to be usable from a quarter of normal resolution right up to high-definition.

Data-rates, seemingly, still need to be pegged back a little, and other refinements made, but the finished Dirac should remove the need for the BBC to pay the massive licensing fees for streaming technology that threaten to kill the corporation's plan to offer "universal access" to TV programs on the net.

Real, Microsoft and other firms who've been expecting massive windfall-profits from streaming licensing fees as broadcasters move onto the net should be very worried.

If the final free Codec turns out to be good enough for Auntie, it's certain to be taken up by broadcasters world-wide.



Other highlights at the BBC R&D open days included hard-to-refute demonstrations of why High Definition TV will be big (and massively well-supported by the BBC); comparisons of competing High Definition TV display technologies; demos of currently available kit to feed HD TV sets; and ways of providing around-the-clock signing for deaf viewers to bring them out of their programming ghetto.

Watch DVdoctor's front page for more on the implications of Dirac and about other R&D goodies. Oh, and have your say about Dirac in this DVdoctor forum thread where there are some useful Dirac-related links.


HEXUS Forums :: 10 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
you kiddin, right?
oh I PRAY Mr Yakolev doesnt follow suit…..
I'd cry.

and Mr Lavochkin.

and Mr Ilyushin.

I feel ill.
You really suprised by this?, This happens with all games - Fifa has to pay heavily to use real player names etc, same with all the other sports type games. I don't see why this is any different.

Be it current or old planes. Now if the names of the planes where changed to be say fighter 1, 2, 3 etc, they might not have any leg to stand on, as the models would be Maddox's property as they certainly built them on their own, and as much as they are good models they are no way property of any Manufacturers.

I hope it doesn't come to anything but i can see the manufacturers point too.

TiG
must be cos Microsoft always pays dividends to the people who's planes THEY use….

so they probably got the arse that the best flight sim ever made wasn't paying royalties to the original owners and thought “we'll stir some pooh over THIS one ”

Its probably as simple as that :(

Thank heavens for the private developers…the skin makes…the map makers….

It'll be Counterstrike in the skies