facebook rss twitter

True 4G to be 500 times faster than 3G

by Steven Williamson on 20 January 2012, 16:01

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qabbl5

Add to My Vault: x

The specifications for high-speed mobile broadband technology that is apparently 500 times faster than 3G smartphones have been approved this week at the ITU Radiocommunication Assembly in Geneva.

IMT-Advanced, which includes the LTE-Advanced and WirelessMAN-Advanced standards, will deliver "a much higher quality and a much higher bit rate, typically of the order of 100 megabits per second."

This means absolutely no time to get a page open,” claims Francois Rance, head of the agency’s radiaocommuication bureau, referring to the wait users currently experience between clicking on a web page and waiting for it to load up. Rancey says that speeds will be so fast that a web page will open in less than 10ms, and users will be able to stream high-definition video at very high bitrates.

 “IMT-Advanced would be like putting a fibre optic broadband connection on your mobile phone, making your phone at least 500 times faster than today’s 3G smart phones," explains Rancy. “But it’s not only about speed; it’s about efficiency. IMT-Advanced will use radio-frequency spectrum much more efficiently making higher data transfers possible on lesser bandwidth. This will enable mobile networks to face the dramatic increase in data traffic that is expected in the coming years

The first influx of 4G devices are expected to land in 2012, with “true” 4G, most likely to be called “5G” by mobile operators, isn’t expected to be available for a least a couple of years.


HEXUS Forums :: 16 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Some call if?

Some call it

:D
Hang on, Typically 100mb, and yet my 3g (hdspa+ that is) does 21mb…

500 times faster?

Erm… Maths Check please Carol
Arthran
Hang on, Typically 100mb, and yet my 3g (hdspa+ that is) does 21mb…

500 times faster?

Erm… Maths Check please Carol

You have 3.5G, orig 3G was 256kbit I believe, though that would make it 400x not 500…
I think it's more about reality, with 3g as saturated as it is, you never realistically receive anywhere close to top speeds in crowded areas.
I think it was the american carriers jumping the gun when they didn't really have 4G. Phone manufacturers had to really copy the rest of the herd so now it'll probably be called 4G+S ;)