facebook rss twitter

Review: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs. GTX 460 1GB - at the same clocks

by Tarinder Sandhu on 1 February 2011, 08:03

Tags: NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qa4at

Add to My Vault: x

Final thoughts

Our review of the GeForce GTX 560 Ti highlights that it is, on average, 33 per cent faster than a GeForce GTX 460 1GB card. The large performance variation intimates that the two GPUs are a class or two apart - a fact that's true when looking at the relative performance of two reference-clocked cards.

However, the GTX 460 1GB is a proven overclocker, with many cards running past the GTX 560 Ti's 822MHz engine and 4,008MHz memory speeds with consummate ease. Understanding that the two cards are closely related in terms of architecture, one question that needs answering is how do the two compare when set to equal frequencies; a state of affairs that can be easily engineered by spending a few moments with an overclocking utility.

Pitting two equally-clocked GTX 460 and GTX 560 Ti cards against one another shows that there's roughly a 10 per cent performance advantage in favour of the newer Ti. This is to be expected at the very least, as the newer GPU has additional shading and texturing units to call upon. But the very fact that a GTX 460 can get into the same frame-rate ballpark means that it remains an excellent buy.

We reckon that the GTX 560 Ti is a quality card that, at launch, is priced a touch too highly, though this is always the case with a new architecture. Folks who splashed out for an el-cheapo GTX 460 1GB in recent months needn't be disheartened at the new arrival; the old GPU still has plenty of legs left, as does any mid-to-high-end card released in the last two years.

The increasing cadence of graphics-card releases translates to per-generation gains that aren't as impressive as one might infer from the nomenclature - the GTX 460 1GB, for example, can run all the code a GTX 560 Ti can, while AMD's been on a DX11 path since September 2009.

With incremental gains in performance and feature-sets that aren't wholly different from previous generations', especially once the enthusiast meddles with frequencies, coupled with the glaring facts that very few PC-only titles require either massive GPU horsepower or, indeed, are must-have purchases, we urge readers to look carefully at their next purchase. Should a 5-series AMD card or 4-series NVIDIA GPU come up at an unbelievably tasty price, we think you should give them serious thought.

 



HEXUS Forums :: 17 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Nice comparison. I do like the look of the GTX 560 as an upgrade to my 8800GT!

Am I missing something though… Somehow, with more compute power (~14%) plus all the other improvements to the 114 GPU over the 104, I was expecting a greater increase. Are you planning a similar test to compare the 114 versus the 110?
ajones
Nice comparison. I do like the look of the GTX 560 as an upgrade to my 8800GT!

Am I missing something though… Somehow, with more compute power (~14%) plus all the other improvements to the 114 GPU over the 104, I was expecting a greater increase. Are you planning a similar test to compare the 114 versus the 110?

The GF114 is basically a higher clockspeed version of the GF104. The GF104 introduced many of the fixes seen in the GF110.
It's a good card, having said that it is possible to get 460 cards for nearly half the price so in terms of pixel per price it's perhaps not as impressive as it seems.
again can i ask you to test the 768meg cards at the same clocks?
why do you only to minimums for some games, and not all?