facebook rss twitter

Intel Sandy Bridge CPUs hit UK retail

by Parm Mann on 10 January 2011, 10:15

Tags: Intel (NASDAQ:INTC)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qa3ws

Add to My Vault: x

Been eager to get your fix of Intel Core "Sandy Bridge" processors? You're in luck, as the second-generation chips have now started to filter through to UK retail.

Launched a week ago today, the new Core i3, Core i5 and Core i7 parts feature a bevy of upgrades that raise the bar for processing power and integrated graphics capability. We won't revisit the finer details - you can read our review for those - but we will point out that we found the Sandy Bridge architecture to be " an improvement over 2010's Lynnfield chips in practically every way."

The performance numbers churned out by the Core i5 2500K and range-topping Core i7 2600K might have had you chomping at the bit, so here's a quick breakdown of Sandy Bridge availability from SCAN.co.uk:

Model number Cores /
Threads
GHz clock Turbo Boost Process Cache Graphics Graphics speed Intel US pricing
(per 1Ku tray units)
SCAN.co.uk* pricing
Core i5 2300 4/4 2.80 3.10 32nm 1MB L2
6MB L3
HD 2000 1,100MHz $177 £150.28
Core i5 2400 4/4 3.10 3.40 32nm 1MB L2
6MB L3
HD 2000 1,100MHz $184 £152.69
Core i5 2500 4/4 3.30 3.70 32nm 1MB L2
6MB L3
HD 2000 1,100MHz $205 £168.30
Core i5 2500K 4/4 3.30 3.70 32nm 1MB L2
6MB L3
HD 3000 1,100MHz $216 £176.70
Core i7 2600 4/8 3.40 3.80 32nm 1MB L2
8MB L3
HD 2000 1,350MHz $294 £242.71
Core i7 2600K 4/8 3.40 3.80 32nm 1MB L2
8MB L3
HD 3000 1,350MHz $317 £258.31

The entire Sandy Bridge range isn't yet available - we've yet to see any second-generation Core i3 models in stock - but SCAN does have the above Core i5 and Core i7 parts readily available. Pricing is almost exactly what we expected, and for those of you eyeing-up the overclocker-friendly(er) "K" chips, you'll find SCAN's £176 and £258 price tags to be very competitive.

Before you part with your hard earned, though, remember that all Sandy Bridge chips are designed to utilise the new LGA1155 socket. Upgrades on previous-generation motherboards are a no-go, so you'll need to fork out a little extra and pick up a supporting H67 or P67 board.

Any readers planning a Sandy Bridge build? Or has the change in chipset along with the more complicated overclocking process done enough to dissuade you? Let us know in the HEXUS.community forums, and if you've already placed your order, we're always intrigued to hear which parts and processors you've opted for.



*As always, UK-based HEXUS.community forum members will benefit from the SCAN2HEXUS Free Shipping initiative, which will save you a further few pounds plus also top-notch, priority customer service and technical support backed up by the SCANcare@HEXUS forum.



HEXUS Forums :: 16 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Is it just me? Or has Intel screwed up the marketing for the Sandy Bridge?

  • The K series processors have the CPU multiplier unlocked.
  • The K series are also the only chips with the faster 3000 integrated GPU enabled.
  • Integrated GPUs only work when used with H67 chipset.
  • H67 chipset does not support CPU multiplier changing.

  • Integrated GPUs do not work on the P67 chipset (even as a physics processor).
  • You cannot use QuickSync on P67.

Will these issues leave everyone waiting for the touted Z68 chipset in Q2?
That is pretty funny. :lol:
I'm guessing it's not by accident though, the faster GPU might give non-OCers a reason to buy the k CPUs and since this overclocking business will likely drive away a fair few overclockers (IMO) they will need the sales. It is stupid that the H67 doesn't allow unlocking though. But I've said before and I'll say it again, this overclocking BS is really turning me away from Intel and I bet plenty of overclockers feel the same way (excluding fanboys, of course). The whole idea of overclocking is to buy a cheap CPU and run it as fast as a more expensive one with a bit of effort, not buy a more expensive CPU which might not even OC well (unless Intel test them?). And even then am I right in thinking the only thing you can change is the core speed, not memory speed, etc?
Well I know these issues mean im waiting :) Why should I pay over the odds for a new chip when I cant even use all of its functions?
Oh and BTW shouldn't that be i5 2500k and i7 2600? I'm not sure though, this naming system doesn't make much sense. I thought it would be 27xx for i5, 29xx for i7 or something - like you get i7 8xx and 9xx, i5 6xx and 7xx, etc now. It just seems like a lucky dip of numbers now? :confused:
Agreed this release is very flawed - whether that is by accident or as intended I am not sure. Leaves me very much thinking I will wait to see what these Z68 motherboards actually bring to the table or even skip Intel and wait and see what AMD bring to that same table.

But wouldn't touch them with a bargepole at the moment … especially with a few reports of chips being cooked in a few days.:redcard:

IMHO Intel seem to be making a pigs ear of it at the moment despite being in a dominant position and they will need to step up their game if and when AMD start fighting back.