facebook rss twitter

Review: NVIDIA ASUS GeForce GTS 450 1GB graphics card

by Tarinder Sandhu on 13 September 2010, 05:05 3.5

Tags: GeForce GTS 450 1GB TOP, ASUSTeK (TPE:2357), NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qazy6

Add to My Vault: x

Final thoughts and rating

NVIDIA's release of the $129 (£99) GeForce GTS 450 GPU paves the way for the company to address a larger proportion of the PC games-playing market. The new GPU harnesses the Fermi architecture's modular design to bring a truly mainstream part to the market. GeForce GTS 450 is practically half a 'perfect' GeForce GTX 460 1,024MB GPU, and as such it is equipped with 192 CUDA cores, a 128-bit memory bus, and GDDR5 memory.

With AMD's near-year-old Radeon HD 5750 firmly in the crosshairs, both in terms of cost and performance, GeForce GTS 450's gaming credentials are generally analogous to AMD's mid-range offering. This means that both will play most modern games at a 1,680x1,050 resolution with medium-detail eye-candy turned on. Putting the numbers into wider context, our benchmarks also show that, on average, GTS 450 provides around 70 per cent of the performance exhibited by the recently price-reduced (£120) GeForce GTX 460 768MB, which is rumoured to be made end of life soon.

While NVIDIA matches AMD on gaming performance, the company's latest GPU doesn't do so well with respect to energy efficiency, drawing, as a system, some 26W more than its immediate AMD competition. What's more, we're unlikely to see single-slot GTS 450 cards any time soon, given the power-draw, so folk looking for a decent card to house in a small form factor system may need to wait a while.

Appreciating the frequency potential that exits in mid-range Fermi cards, NVIDIA is giving partners carte blanche to launch overclocked models from the get-go. Perhaps the best example of the GTS 450's scope lies with the ASUS ENGTS450 TOP - accelerated from the default 783MHz/3,608MHz clocks to 925MHz/4,000MHz. The extra speed puts it in touch with a Radeon HD 5770 GPU, but the downside of such grand overclocking is power-draw that's higher than a GeForce GTX 460 768MB's.

The mainstream graphics market is highly sensitive to price. NVIDIA and its partners need to ensure that GeForce GTS 450 cards are priced at below Radeon HD 5750 1,024MB levels, to pull potential purchasers away from AMD. This dictates an at-launch price of under £100 for basic models and not much more than £100 for factory-clocked cards, frankly, because the excellent GTX 460 768MB now retails from £120.

The bottom line is that the GTS 450 1,024MB GPU is a welcome addition to the mid-range fold if priced sensibly. It carries all of Fermi's goodness, albeit naturally pared down, and is backed by NVIDIA's 3D Vision and PhysX goodness. We're a little less keen on super-highly-clocked partner cards; they're compromised by high power-draw and pricing that's a little too close to GTX 460 768MB's. Perhaps NVIDIA will solve this mid-range conundrum with the release of a full-fat GF106 die, that is, GTS 450 cards equipped with a 192-bit memory interface and 24 ROPs. We wait with bated breath.

The Good

Solid performance for a £100 card
Decent overclocking headroom
ASUS card is highly overclocked and provides voltage adjustment

The Bad

ASUS card has unenviable power-draw characteristics
GTS 450 not much better than year-old AMD GPU
GeForce GTX 460 768MB offers stern competition, priced at £120-plus

HEXUS Rating

3.5/5
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 1,024MB
3/5
ASUS ENGTS450 TOP 1,024MB

HEXUS Where2Buy

TBC.

HEXUS Right2Reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



HEXUS Forums :: 17 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Meh. Seems that apart from the GTX460, nothing good will come from GF10*. Roll on Radeon 6000 series!
I'd be interested to see how these cards stack up against ones from older generations, I suspect many people are in the same position as me and have older cards (I'm on an 8800gtx) and are wondering just how much better the newer mid-range are in terms of both performance and heat/energy-usage. It can be quite difficult to find useful comparison benchmarks online as the test suites used for cards a few years ago are obviously quite different and while it's good to see how these new cards perform under new games with DX11 it can make it difficult to perform fair comparisons.

…quite fancy a 460 though :)
Yeah, I'd like to see how these stack up against older cards as well. I'm looking to upgrade my Radeon 4870 soon(ish) and like the previous poster said, its rather difficult to work out how your old card compares to a new one.
The cheapest HD5770 1GB on Scan is £112:

http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/1GB-XFX-HD5770-PCI-E-20(x16)-4800MHz-GDDR5-GPU-850MHz-Cores-800-2x-DL-DVI-I-HDMI

This means the bang for buck score needs to be recalculated.
Animus404
Yeah, I'd like to see how these stack up against older cards as well. I'm looking to upgrade my Radeon 4870 soon(ish) and like the previous poster said, its rather difficult to work out how your old card compares to a new one.

Well a 4870 isn't far of a 5770 IIRC, so there is little point in you buying anything less than a 5850 or GTX460 1GB.

Generally I find if you spent £X on the last gen you need to spend the same this gen for it to be much of an upgrade. This gen's mid-range about equals last gen's low-higher end.