facebook rss twitter

Review: Intel Core i7 875K and Core i5 655K - unlocked chips for enthusiasts

by Tarinder Sandhu on 28 May 2010, 05:00 3.0

Tags: Core i7 875K, Intel Core i5 655K, Intel (NASDAQ:INTC)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qayis

Add to My Vault: x

Final thoughts and rating

Intel's Core i5 655K and Core i7 875K CPUs represent the chip giant's tacit appreciation of the enthusiast community. Ostensibly the same as the regular 650 and 870 models but shipping in OEM form and unshackled from any possible limitations imposed by mulitplier locks, Intel hopes that enthusiasts takes them on and pushes to the limit.

The 875K should appear at etail for around £300, representing a £100-plus saving over a full-retail 870. Intel knows that it won't sell many 870s in the channel due to the noisome combination of high price and roughly equivalent performance from its Core i7 930 and, looking across, from AMD's Phenom II X6 1090T. £300 is still £50 too much for a chip whose defining characteristic is an unlocked (upwards) multiplier, which will only come into play if it can be pushed to 5GHz-plus. What's more, the air-cooling headroom of the chip appears to be rather limited, compromised no doubt by the 875K becoming too hot when under load.

Switching gears, the dual-core Intel Core i5 655K's value proposition isn't good. Due to hit the etail shelves for £200, thereby putting it in the crosshairs of the six-core Phenom II X6 1055T and ever-useful Core i7 920, the high-frequency overclock cannot compensate for the lack of cores. We also doubt if users will bother with the chip's integrated graphics.

Intel's decision to launch a couple of K-class chips is laudable but perhaps hamstrung by the way the current Core range lines up. Having an unlocked multiplier on two average-value CPUs isn't ideal; we'd much rather see a Core i7 935K, yet that won't happen because it would nullify the more-expensive models higher up in the range.

Bottom line: Intel's Core i7 875K and Core i5 655K are semi-interesting chips that may tickle the fancy of a few enthusiasts. The inescapable problem they face lies with the quality of sub-£200 full-retail CPUs from both Intel and AMD.

HEXUS Rating

Three Star

Intel Core i7 875K

Two Star

Intel Core i5 655K

HEXUS Where2Buy

TBC.

HEXUS Right2Reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



HEXUS Forums :: 4 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
As usual another good objective review from Hexus!
This chip would have been sweet in 32nm… ;)
The point? on Page 2 seems a little odd.

Surely it's the ability of the P55 chipset to run higher base clocks that should be relevent when talking about the s1156 K series processors, not the s1366 x58 chipset.

And realistically they're not really chips aimed at the enthusiast, the point may be to run higher frequencies on less enthusiast based mainboards without baseclock adjustment (such as an OEM ‘gaming’ system?), as most enthusiasts would realise that performance for a set frequency would be better with higher BCLK/lower multi than stock BCLK/higher multi.
Some Water Closeting would have been nice. Review said 875k might have gone higher if not on air. Why not find out!?