facebook rss twitter

Review: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T: hexa-core computing for the masses

by Parm Mann on 27 April 2010, 05:00 4.0

Tags: Phenom II X6 1055T, Phenom II X6 1090T, AMD (NYSE:AMD)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaxym

Add to My Vault: x

Gaming and power-draw

Percentage faster/slower
than Phenom II X6 1090T
Phenom II
X6 1055T
Phenom II
X4 965 BE
Core i7
980X
Core i7
930
Core i7
920
- 7.90% + 1.19% + 44.75% + 25.20% + 21.58%

Additional cores do little to aid gaming performance in Far Cry 2. A better multi-threaded title may paint a different picture, but PC games designed to fully utilise all available CPU cores remain few and far between. Intel's architecture clearly has the edge in this title.



Percentage faster/slower
than Phenom II X6 1090T
Phenom II
X6 1055T
Phenom II
X4 965 BE
Core i7
980X
Core i7
930
Core i7
920
- 0.59% + 0.40% + 1.11% - 1.18% - 1.30%

More to the point, when the GPU becomes the limiting factor, there's little to choose between dual, quad or hexa-core CPUs.



Percentage better/worse
than Phenom II X6 1090T
Phenom II
X6 1055T
Phenom II
X4 965 BE
Core i7
980X
Core i7
930
Core i7
920
+ 1.20% 0.00% - 51.81% - 39.76% - 39.76%

You might call the Phenom II X6 1090T an X4 965 BE with two extras cores and a little extra L2 cache. Nonetheless, AMD does well to keep idle power draw practically identical.



Percentage better/worse
than Phenom II X6 1090T
Phenom II
X6 1055T
Phenom II
X4 965 BE
Core i7
980X
Core i7
930
Core i7
920
+ 3.85% 0.00% - 33.52% - 13.74% - 12.64%

The X6 1090T and X4 965 BE are identical under load, too. Intel's high-end platforms are clearly the hungrier option.