facebook rss twitter

Review: Sapphire Radeon HD 5670 1,024MB - invading the mid-range space

by Tarinder Sandhu on 14 January 2010, 05:00 3.15

Tags: ATI Radeon HD 5670, Win7 - Radeon HD 5670 1GB, AMD (NYSE:AMD), Sapphire

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qavm4

Add to My Vault: x

Final thoughts and rating

There was never any doubt that AMD was going to milk its DX11 graphics-card architecture, first released with the performance HD 5870 part, for all it was worth before NVIDIA came steaming in with its own next-generation models.

As of today, AMD has six distinct GPUs based on the Radeon 5-series design, ranging from the Radeon HD 5670 to the Radeon HD 5970. The GPUs now encompass a wide pricing bracket that begins at £70 and tops out at £550.

The Radeon HD 5670 will be available in two flavours from most partners. Cards equipped with a 512MB framebuffer will likely ship for around £70 today, whilst those with a 1,024MB buffer and a wider selection of display ports will cost in the region of £90.

AMD needs to get the HD 5670 right, because research indicates that two-thirds of all discrete GPUs sold cost under $100. From an architecture point of view, then, AMD has got it right - indeed it's hard to get it wrong when the base design is damn good.

The main problem with Radeon HD 5670, especially the parts equipped with a 1,024MB framebuffer, is that the high etail price of £90 takes away much of the shine for an otherwise-good GPU. The better-performing Radeon HD 5750 costs just a little more, and NVIDIA's much-revamped GeForce GTS 250 is also a fundamentally better gaming performer.

Sapphire would do well to drop the price of this particular card to, say, £70, which may well occur by market forces in the coming weeks. Should it do so, we would have little reservation in recommending it to a wide range of purchasers. As it is, the current pricing, £90, makes it stuck between a rock and a hard space.

Good

Radeon 5-series feature-set: DX11, Eyefinity, et al.
Low power-draw
Good temperatures
Quiet cooler

Not so good

High etail price for HD 5670 1,024MB...for now

HEXUS Rating

We consider any product score above '50/100' as a safe buy. The higher the score, the higher the recommendation from HEXUS to buy. Simple, straightforward buying advice.

The rating is given in relation to the category the component competes in, therefore Sapphire's Radeon HD 5670 1,024MB is evaluated with respect to our 'mid-range' criteria.

63%
Sapphire Radeon HD 5670 1,024MB

HEXUS Where2Buy

The Sapphire Radeon HD 5670 1,024MB graphics card can be ordered now from the following retailers:


As always, UK-based HEXUS.community discussion forum members will benefit from the SCAN2HEXUS Free Shipping initiative, which will save you a further few pounds plus also top-notch, priority customer service and technical support backed up by the SCANcare@HEXUS forum.

£93.24 (pre-order)
 
£89.99 (pre-order)

HEXUS Right2Reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



HEXUS Forums :: 5 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
The better-performing Radeon HD 5750 costs just a little more
It's worse than that - a 512MB XFX 5750 (albeit not in stock) has a scan list price of £87 - cheaper than the 5670.

It's a real shame that the price isn't significantly lower. These cards *should* be £50 - £70, making them genuinely price-competitive against the 4670 and the GT240 / 9600GT. With a starting price of £70 for a card that can't outperform a 9800GT *and* doesn't have Eyefinity or CrosfireX support, they're a huge waste of money, and if you move up the range to get those features you're solidly into 5750 territory. I just don't get it…
Most of the 9800GT 512MB cards available at around £70 are the Green Edition versions which have lower clockspeeds. It would have been useful if this review compared the 512MB version of the HD5670 to this.
There is a mistake? “and the HD 4670 can be purchased for around £50, making it much cheaper than the HD 4670” On system setup :D.

Also, how about testing this card without AA at 1200 res? My friend uses a 9600 and never uses AA…. This card seems to dislike AA so without it you may see it overtakes a bit more!.

The 1gb isnt worth it though imo.
scaryjim
It's worse than that - a 512MB XFX 5750 (albeit not in stock) has a scan list price of £87 - cheaper than the 5670.

It's a real shame that the price isn't significantly lower. These cards *should* be £50 - £70, making them genuinely price-competitive against the 4670 and the GT240 / 9600GT. With a starting price of £70 for a card that can't outperform a 9800GT *and* doesn't have Eyefinity or CrosfireX support, they're a huge waste of money, and if you move up the range to get those features you're solidly into 5750 territory. I just don't get it…

or £80 on TodayOnly at Scan for XFX 512mb 5750… this needs to be at £60 to be value

At £60 I'd prob replace my 4670 in one machine, other has 5750 as above ;)

Great cards but price matters!"
Yes exactly, the expected launch price is very wrong.
Held off buying the 4670 as these should slot in as replacements at the same/lower price point but the 4670 has been held at an artificially high price for a long time too (compared to relative performance).