facebook rss twitter

Intel rubbishes NVIDIA ION graphics for netbooks. Terms them overkill

by Tarinder Sandhu on 24 December 2009, 11:41

Tags: Intel (NASDAQ:INTC), NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qavic

Add to My Vault: x

Intel and NVIDIA look set to continue their spat concerning the hardware that powers netbooks. It can be argued that Intel provided the fundamental stimulus for netbook growth when it released the Atom chip in 2008.

Custom-designed for low power and small mobile form factors, the chip has been taken up by almost everyone. The chip giant then recently launched the second-generation Atom, complete with integrated graphics and, consequently, lower platform-wide power-draw.

With Intel's focus on making Atom cheap and cheerful, the multimedia capabilities were largely neglected - a situation that remains true today. Graphics experts NVIDIA saw an opportunity and released its ION platform to complement Atom and provide basic 3D gaming as well as broader, feature-rich 2D functionality.

Now with second-gen Atom having integrated graphics, NVIDIA's job of marketing a discrete GPU - most likely called ION 2 - to its partners will become a little more difficult. The company will claim that netbook-orientated Atom still has fundamental problems in handing high-definition video files and Flash, so the need for better 'graphics' is indisputable for most folk.

Intel agrees that having multimedia capabilities on netbooks can be important for some, but rubbishes NVIDIA's ION as overkill. Intel Netbook Marketing Manager Anil Nanduri had this to say to Laptop Magazine.

What’s your take on Nvidia Ion so far?

"To run multimedia you don’t need a huge graphics chip. And that’s what those third-party decoder solutions will show in the marketplace. There are much more innovative ways to get multimedia capabilities that will continue to provide lower power and longer battery life. In terms of usages, netbooks are not meant for gaming. You can run Internet games fine today with the existing solutions. We believe (Ion) adds unnecessary additional cost and the other trade-offs make it less desirable. Our customers have the option to design netbooks how they want to but ultimately the market is going to decide".

What Nanduri is referring to is Intel's preferred third-party decoder, Broadcom's Crystal HD, presumably a lower-cost solution than NVIDIA's ION 2. We reckon that netbooks, as most see them, should have battery-life as their primary criterion, with gaming relegated some way down the list. Taking this view, we have some sympathy for Nanduri's stance, and think that NVIDIA will need to really aggressively price ION 2 if it's to succeed.


HEXUS Forums :: 6 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Yea its much better to be forced to use a crappy peice of software to run your HD content rather than being free to choose and run games :rolleyes:
People are realizing that they don't need to spend £500 to do most of what they actually want a laptop for.
Intel know that Netbooks are being re-positioned from a basic spec machine to an average spec machine and it's hurting their profit margin. They have to differentiate between a £200 netbook and a £500 laptop and it's mostly about the graphics chipset, which ION is eroding.
I think Intel are just being petty because they haven't developed something like the Ion themselves.

I think they would have developed it if they could have, and if they did they obviously would be saying the complete opposite and hailing it the future of the netbook.

People aren't forced to buy an Ion anyway - if they want it they get it, if they want a more basic model - they don't!
What an argument…. There graphics are too good you don't want them :stupid: Admittedly power consumption is an issue, but so is userbility…
Translation from Intel-marketing speak to human: “We don't have anything that can remotely compete in graphics, so we have decided that you don't need it.”