Published: Thursday 2nd July, 2009 | Author: Parm Mann
Products: Windows 7
Companies: Microsoft (All Microsoft content)
External reviews: Microsoft Windows 7
printer friendly layout 
discuss in the forums 
email to a friendMicrosoft's Windows 7 pricing and promotions have already managed to confuse most consumers, but a number of questions remain unanswered.
One of the most notable, is what do you do if you're a home user wanting to run Windows 7 on multiple PCs?
Digging around a recently-leaked and presumably near-final build of the Windows 7 Home Premium operating system, Kristan from kristankenney.com found the following usage rights amid the operating system's software license terms. The interesting revelation is highlighted in bold:
2. INSTALLATION AND USE RIGHTS.
a. One Copy per Computer. Except as allowed in Section 2 (b) below, you may install one copy of the software on one computer. That computer is the “licensed computer.”b. Family Pack. If you are a “Qualified Family Pack User”, you may install one copy of the software marked as “Family Pack” on three computers in your household for use by people who reside there. Those computers are the “licensed computers” and are subject to these license terms. If you do not know whether you are a Qualified Family Pack User, visit go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?Linkid=141399 or contact the Microsoft affiliate serving your country.
c. Licensed Computer. You may use the software on up to two processors on the licensed computer at one time. Unless otherwise provided in these license terms, you may not use the software on any other computer.
d. Number of Users. Unless otherwise provided in these license terms, only one user may use the software at a time.
e. Alternative Versions. The software may include more than one version, such as 32-bit and 64-bit. You may install and use only one version at one time.
Microsoft has previously stated that it's evaluating multi-PC licensing, but, at present, the only official way to run Windows 7 on multiple PCs is to purchase multiple copies when it arrives in stores on October 22nd.
That hardly sounds elegant, and indeed, it's an archaic solution considering that one of Microsoft's fiercest rivals, Apple, will be offering a five-user family pack of its upcoming Snow Leopard operating system for under $50.
We're hopeful that Microsoft will announce a competent solution to multiple Windows 7 licenses prior to its October launch, and it looks as though that could arrive in the form of a Windows 7 Home Premium Family Pack.
As for pricing, it's safe to assume that the Family Pack would be priced higher than the £79.99 standard Windows 7 Home Premium E. £99.99 sounds a reasonable figure for a three-system license, we reckon.
Copyright © 1998 - 2010, HEXUS.net. All rights reserved. Terms, conditions and privacy information.
HEXUS® is a registered trademark of HEXUS Limited.
2010, the year of...
IE7 Search
Firefox 2 Search
HEXUS.community :: your right2reply
It's definitely a step in the right direction for M$, but how many people are going to bite? The vast majority of home users aren't the kind of people who are going to install a new o/s on their computers & then re-install all their apps.
Tell that to my uncle who barely knows how to turn on his PC, who bought Windows Xp Pro to upgrade from Xp Home all because his mates told him it was worth doing. I didn't think it worth the aggravation to tell him there is no difference for a user like him.
I'm just waiting for the queue of phone calls from friends and family asking me for help installing Win7 on their perfectly working Vista PC's just because they've been told its 100x better.Quote
3 x £79.99 = £149.99?
Epic Maths Fail (the second time I've used that phrase on these forums in a week!).
Actually, I'd buy a three computer Windows 7 Home Premium pack for £149.99: £50 per computer? Sounds reasonable to me in the same way that pre-ordering for £49.99 sounds reasonable.
Now, how about a 3 pack of Pro for £199.99...? ;)
Epic failure to read the whole thread. If you had you would have seen that the original precept was that they would be charging £99.99 (3 x £33.33) for the 3 pack thus making it a truely reasonable investment at in effect 3 for the price of 2 at the pre-order price. However the follow on posts all think that the price is more likely to £149.99 (3 x £49.9933...) or over 3 times the price of the pre-order pack and 2p dearer than pre-ordering 3 individual copies. In effect 3 for the price of 3 and a little bit.
Your own idea of a 3 pack of Pro for £199.99 is basically the same maths function 3 for 2 at the offer price. However it's MS and hence you'll be paying £299.99 for a 3 pack and it's still 2p dearer than 3 individual copies.Quote
Epic failure to read the whole thread. If you had you would have seen that the original precept was that they would be charging £99.99 (3 x £33.33) for the 3 pack thus making it a truely reasonable investment at in effect 3 for the price of 2 at the pre-order price. However the follow on posts all think that the price is more likely to £149.99 (3 x £49.9933...) or over 3 times the price of the pre-order pack and 2p dearer than pre-ordering 3 individual copies. In effect 3 for the price of 3 and a little bit.
Your own idea of a 3 pack of Pro for £199.99 is basically the same maths function 3 for 2 at the offer price. However it's MS and hence you'll be paying £299.99 for a 3 pack and it's still 2p dearer than 3 individual copies.
So.... have prices been published yet, or are people just getting nerdrage about rumours and conjecture?Quote
So.... have prices been published yet, or are people just getting nerdrage about rumours and conjecture?
All 100% made up based on our opinions I think. Certainly no rumours about pricing yet for it that I've seen.
But that's part of the fun - seeing who guessed closest, if this ever sees the light of day ;)Quote
Reply