Call of Duty 4: MW
| Call of Duty 4: MW (high-end) 1,680x1,050 4xAA 16xAF | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS HD 4890 VT 1,024MB | Sapphire HD 4870 1,024MB | ASUS ENGTX260 MATRIX 896MB | BFG GTX 260 896MB | Inno3D GTX 275 OC 896MB | NVIDIA GTX 275 896MB | Sapphire HD 4890 OC+ 1,024MB |
| 85.3 | 78.44 | 78.4 | 76.5 | 91.05 | 87.75 | 88.2 |
| Call of Duty 4: MW (high-end) 1,920x1,200 4xAA 16xAF | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS HD 4890 VT 1,024MB | Sapphire HD 4870 1,024MB | ASUS ENGTX260 MATRIX 896MB | BFG GTX 260 896MB | Inno3D GTX 275 OC 896MB | NVIDIA GTX 275 896MB | Sapphire HD 4890 OC+ 1,024MB |
| 72.55 | 66.15 | 65.9 | 65.55 | 79 | 75.8 | 76.1 |
| Call of Duty 4: MW (high-end) 2,560x1,600 4xAA 16xAF | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS HD 4890 VT 1,024MB | Sapphire HD 4870 1,024MB | ASUS ENGTX260 MATRIX 896MB | BFG GTX 260 896MB | Inno3D GTX 275 OC 896MB | NVIDIA GTX 275 896MB | Sapphire HD 4890 OC+ 1,024MB |
| 47.95 | 43.75 | 46.1 | 44.65 | 54.45 | 52.65 | 50.05 |
The GeForce GTX 260 MATRIX doesn't eke out much of a lead over the stock-clocked card. What's clear here is that Radeon HD 4890 and GeForce GTX 275 are simply better performers.
