RSS 2.0 News Feed
HEXUS.net - Definitive Technology News and Reviews
Latest content
Notebooks
Notebooks
NVIDIA Optimus technology: mobile GPU implementation done right?
Latest Reviews
minimise maximise
Beans
minimise maximise
Guides
minimise maximise
Press Releases
minimise maximise

ATI Radeon HD 5870 hits the rumour mill

Graphics
Graphics

Published: Wednesday 29th April, 2009 | Author: Parm Mann
Companies: AMD (All AMD content), ATi Technologies (All ATi Technologies content)

Addthis
printer friendly layout     discuss in the forums     email to a friend
Advertisement

Now that ATI has established a 40nm manufacturing process with its Radeon HD 4770, it was only a matter of time before the rumour mill began to churn out details of other upcoming 40nm parts.

Today, the attention's turning to potential RV870-based parts. According to German site hardware-infos.com, ATI's RV770 successor will arrive as soon as July '09 in the form of the Radeon HD 5870 and the dual-GPU Radeon HD 5870 X2.

It is, of course, entirely speculation at this moment in time. However, should the report be believed, the products will line up with the following specifications:

Graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 1,792MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 1,024MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 1,024MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 896MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 896MB ATI Radeon HD 5870 X2 2,048MB* ATI Radeon HD 5870 1,024MB* AMD Radeon HD 4870 X2 2,048MB AMD Radeon HD 4850 X2 2,048MB AMD Radeon HD 4890 1,024MB AMD Radeon HD 4870 512MB AMD Radeon HD 4850 512MB
PCIe PCIe 2.0
GPU(s) clock 576MHz 648MHz 602MHz 633MHz 576MHz 950MHz 900MHz 750MHz 625MHz 850MHz 750MHz 625MHz
Shader clock 1,242MHz 1,476MHz 1,296MHz 1,404MHz 1,242MHz 950MHz 900MHz 750MHz 625MHz 850MHz 750MHz 625MHz
Memory clock (effective) 1,998MHz 2,484MHz 2,214MHz 2,322MHz 1,998MHz 4,600MHz 4,400MHz 3,600MHz 1,986MHz 3,900MHz 3,600MHz 1,986MHz
Memory interface and size 448-bit (per GPU), 1,792MB, GDDR3 512-bit, 1,024MB, GDDR3 512-bit, 1,024MB, GDDR3 448-bit, 896MB, GDDR3 448-bit, 896MB, GDDR3 512-bit (2x 256-bit), 2,048MB, GDDR5 256-bit, 1,024MB, GDDR5 512-bit (2x 256-bit), 2,048MB, GDDR5 512-bit (2x 256-bit), 2,048MB, GDDR3 256-bit, 1,024MB, GDDR5 256-bit, 512MB, GDDR5 256-bit, 512MB, GDDR3
Manufacturing process TSMC, 55nm TSMC, 55nm TSMC, 65nm TSMC, 55nm TSMC, 65nm TSMC, 40nm TSMC, 40nm TSMC, 55nm TSMC, 55nm TSMC, 55nm TSMC, 55nm TSMC, 55nm
DirectX/ Shader Model DX10, 4.0 DX10, 4.0 DX10, 4.0 DX10, 4.0 DX10, 4.0 DX11, 5.0 DX11, 5.0 DX10.1, 4.1 DX10.1, 4.1 DX10.1, 4.1 DX10.1, 4.1 DX10.1, 4.1
Vertex, fragment, geometry shading (shared) 480 FP32 scalar ALUs, MADD dual-issue + MUL (unified) 240 FP32 scalar ALUs, MADD dual-issue + MUL (unified) 240 FP32 scalar ALUs, MADD dual-issue + MUL (unified) 240 FP32 scalar ALUs, MADD dual-issue + MUL (unified) 216 FP32 scalar ALUs, MADD dual-issue + MUL (unified) 2,400 FP32 scalar ALUs, MADD dual-issue (unified) 1,200 FP32 scalar ALUs, MADD dual-issue (unified) 1,600 FP32 scalar ALUs, MADD dual-issue (unified) 1,600 FP32 scalar ALUs, MADD dual-issue (unified) 800 FP32 scalar ALUs, MADD dual-issue (unified) 800 FP32 scalar ALUs, MADD dual-issue (unified) 800 FP32 scalar ALUs, MADD dual-issue (unified)
Data sampling and filtering 160ppc address and 160ppc bilinear INT8/80ppc FP16 filtering, max 16xAF 80ppc address and 80ppc bilinear INT8/40ppc FP16 filtering, max 16xAF 80ppc address and 80ppc bilinear INT8/40ppc FP16 filtering, max 16xAF 72ppc address and 72ppc bilinear INT8/36ppc FP16 filtering, max 16xAF 72ppc address and 72ppc bilinear INT8/36ppc FP16 filtering, max 16xAF 192ppc address and 192ppc bilinear INT8/96ppc FP16 filtering, max 16xAF 96ppc address and 96ppc bilinear INT8/48ppc FP16 filtering, max 16xAF 80ppc address and 80ppc bilinear INT8/40ppc FP16 filtering, max 16xAF 80ppc address and 80ppc bilinear INT8/40ppc FP16 filtering, max 16xAF 40ppc address and 40ppc bilinear INT8/20ppc FP16 filtering, max 16xAF 40ppc address and 40ppc bilinear INT8/20ppc FP16 filtering, max 16xAF 40ppc address and 40ppc bilinear INT8/ 20ppc FP16 filtering, max 16xAF
ROPs 56 32 32 28 28 64 32 32 32 16 16 16
Peak GFLOPS 1,788 1,063 933 1,011 805 4,560 2,160 2,400 2,000 1,360 1,200 1,000
Peak fillrate Gpixels/s 32.256 20.736 19.264 17.724 16.128 60.8 28.8 24 20 13.6 12 10
Peak Gtexel/s (bilinear) 92.2 51.84 48.16 45.576 41.472 91.2 86.4 60 50 34 30 25
Peak Gtexel/s (FP16, bilinear) 46.1 25.92 24.09 22.788 20.736 45.6 43.2 30 25 17 15 12.5
*rumoured product and specification

The numbers are anything but confirmed, but we could be looking at 4,560 GFLOPS from the Radeon HD 5870 X2 - almost double that of the Radeon HD 4870 X2.


Please share this:

HEXUS related reading

HEXUS.net - reviews :: AMD Radeon HD 5450 graphics-card review. £40 of value?
HEXUS.net - news :: AMD rolls out ATI Catalyst 10.1, introduces support for Ubuntu 9.10
HEXUS.channel - news :: AMD steals share from Intel in record quarter for PC sales
HEXUS.channel - interviews :: HEXUS.TalkingShop: AMD as a consumer electronics company
HEXUS.net - news :: AMD bolsters budget CPU line with new Phenom and Athlon additions
HEXUS.net - press releases :: Graphics for Virtually Everything with Club 3D Radeon HD 5570 and Radeon HD 5550
HEXUS.net - press releases :: HIS Launch the Ultimate Low Cost HD Graphics Card
HEXUS.net - press releases :: POWERCOLOR ANNOUNCES THE GRAPHICS FOR ADVANCED HD ENTERTAINMENT: HD5500 SERIES
HEXUS.net - press releases :: VERTEX3D ANNOUNCES THE HD5570 FOR OUTSTAINDING HOME ENTERTAINMENT EXPERIENCE
HEXUS.net - press releases :: SAPPHIRE Launches HD 5570
All AMD related content on HEXUS

HEXUS.community :: your right2reply

Re: News - ATI Radeon HD 5870 hits the rumour mill
no Nvidia has better idle consumption than ATI but when under full load ATI is better performance per wattQuote
Re: News - ATI Radeon HD 5870 hits the rumour mill
Ah I see - ta!Quote
Re: News - ATI Radeon HD 5870 hits the rumour mill

Quote: Biscuit
no Nvidia has better idle consumption than ATI but when under full load ATI is better performance per watt

Horse manure....

http://archive.atomicmpc.com.au/forums.asp?s=2&c=7&t=9354&p=0

Although this doesnt have the VERY latest cards from both sides it does cover 4670-4850 for example (ie mainstream) and Nvidia is POOR on power consumption.

There was just so long I could go letting this inaccuracy slide... :O_o1:Quote
Re: News - ATI Radeon HD 5870 hits the rumour mill

Quote: Biscuit
is better performance per watt

I admit overall the ATI cards seem to have overall better idle power consumption than the Nvidia 'equivalents' but that chart doesnt take in the above quote at all and the main cards which are compared (as they have extremely similar performance) are 4870 and GTX260 where my statement holds true.Quote
Re: News - ATI Radeon HD 5870 hits the rumour mill

Quote: Methanoid
Horse manure....

http://archive.atomicmpc.com.au/forums.asp?s=2&c=7&t=9354&p=0

Although this doesnt have the VERY latest cards from both sides it does cover 4670-4850 for example (ie mainstream) and Nvidia is POOR on power consumption.

There was just so long I could go letting this inaccuracy slide... :O_o1:

You're not talking about the performance sector here, but that's what we're interested in, and it's a very different story purely because of the DDR5 in the 4870 upwards which can't be put in a low voltage idle state. Therefore ATI cards have high idle power compared to the nVidia's, but a lower 100% load draw.Quote

Reply

Marcus Evans scam
Marcus Evans scam prevention conferences will help you to detect and deter fraud within your company.

My HEXUS


:: New User
:: Lost Password

Browser Plugins
:: IE7 Search
:: Firefox 2 Search
Hottest items
minimise maximise
Latest Poll
minimise maximise

2010, the year of...








Headlines
minimise maximise