facebook rss twitter

Review: ATI rolls out Catalyst 9.3 with official Windows 7 support: HEXUS benchmarks high-end graphics

by Tarinder Sandhu on 18 March 2009, 05:00

Tags: AMD (NYSE:AMD), ATi Technologies (NYSE:AMD), NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA), XFX (HKG:1079), BFG Technologies

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qarg6

Add to My Vault: x

Initial thoughts

Graphics cards XFX Radeon HD 4870 X2 2,048MB (Vista) XFX Radeon HD 4870 X2 2,048MB (Win7) BFG GeForce GTX 295 1,792MB (Vista) BFG GeForce GTX 295 1,792MB (Win7)
Aggregate marks at 2,560x1,600 362.94
371.7
409.1
398.5
Aggregate marks, normalised*, at 2,560x1,600 327.89
333.03
354.55
336.05
Current pricing, including VAT £344.40 £344.40
£449.15
£449.15
HEXUS.bang4buck score at 2,560x1,600 0.952
0.967
0.789
0.748

* the normalisation refers to taking playable frame rate into account. Should a card benchmark at over 60 frames per second in any one game, the extra fps count as half. Similarly, should a card benchmark lower, say at 40fps, we deduct half the difference from its average frame rate and the desired 60fps, giving it a HEXUS.bang4buck score of 30 marks. The minimum allowable frame rate is 20fps but that scores zero. The HEXUS.bang4buck score only takes the performance and price into account.

Summary

What we see is that the ATI card's performance is slightly better, at 2,560x1,600, under Windows 7. Conversely, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 gains in Company of Heroes but loses out more in other titles, including Far Cry 2 and Race Driver: GRID. As such, its aggregate and normalised scores are a touch lower. End result? Taken on the balance of our five games, ATI's driver appears to be slightly more robust with respect to performance, but neither driver is horribly bad, unless playing Far Cry 2 is your thing.

Next, we'll be looking at Windows 7 and Vista performance on ATI and NVIDIA's low-end and mid-range cards, so stay tuned for that.

Windows 7 is still some way off from being released to the public in retail form, but ATI has come in early and is building Windows 7 (WDDM v1.1) support right into all subsequent Catalyst sets, intimating that a WHQL driver will be ready on the day of Microsoft's official launch. NVIDIA, too, isn't standing still, but, as far as our results are concerned, needs to do a little more optimisation work until the Windows 7 driver is consistently better than Vista's.



HEXUS Forums :: 19 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
http://game.amd.com/us-en/drivers_catalyst.aspx lists 9.2 as the most recently available. Got a link for 9.3?
Interesting article is the mid range test going to include the 4850? I wonder whether this 9.3 driver will fix the bizzare 8 GB RAM issue certain ATI cards have on both 32 and 64 bit windows.
I'm hoping to do a little benchmarking of my own soon (just finished preparing a prerelease 9.3 package for Ubuntu Intrepid).
I know it's still beta, but I thought everyone was saying how much faster W7 is than Vista? Or is that for non-gaming applications? It would be intersting to see how XP does in comparison as well (for Dx9 anyway).
interesting to see that the general trend shows windows 7 offers slight improvement over vista even with the first proper driver releases.

directhex
I'm hoping to do a little benchmarking of my own soon (just finished preparing a prerelease 9.3 package for Ubuntu Intrepid).

How long till this is released public?