facebook rss twitter

Review: NVIDIA (GIGABYTE) GeForce GTX 285 - another high-end contender

by Parm Mann on 15 January 2009, 14:00 3.4

Tags: GV-N285-1GH-B, Gigabyte (TPE:2376), NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA), PC

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaqol

Add to My Vault: x

Temps, overclocking, power-draw

Temperature musings

We perform our testing on an open test-bed with a 120mm fan simulating case airflow.

Graphics cards BFG GeForce GTX 295
1,792MB
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 285
1,024MB
Inno3D GeForce GTX 280
1,024MB
Inno3D GeForce GTX 260 OC
896MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 X2
2,048MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 X2
2,048MB
Ambient temperature 20.5°C 20.6°C 21.5°C 19.7°C 24°C
22°C
Idle temperature 47°C 39°C 47°C 47°C 73°C
42.5°C
Load temperature 72°C 70°C 74°C 70°C 95°C 62.5°C
Ambient-to-load delta 51.5°C 49.4°C 52.5°C 50.3°C 71°C 41°C

As shown in the above table, we see the die-shrunk GeForce GTX 285 operate under load at 4°C lower than the GeForce GTX 280 - effectively matching the load temperature of the overclocked GeForce GTX 260. When idle, the throttled GPU and memory frequencies bring temperature down to an impressive 39°C.

As expected, the transition to half-node 55nm has helped make the GTX 200-series GPU run faster and cooler, too.

At the far right of the table, though, it's worth giving a mention to Sapphire's impressively-cooled Radeon HD 4850 X2. Offering the best HEXUS.bang4buck out of all the cards in our line-up, it also provides a notably-low load temperature of 62.5°C.

Power-draw

Graphics cards BFG GeForce GTX 295
1,792MB

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 285
1,024MB

BFG GeForce GTX 280 OC Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 X2
2,048MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 X2
2,048MB
Idle draw 133W 100W 107W 149W
138W
Load draw 307W 235W 260W 366W 275W

Measuring power-draw at the mains by running 3DMark06's Canyon test at 1,920x1,200 4xAA 16xAF, we see the GeForce GTX 285 consumes notably less power than a pre-overclocked GeForce GTX 280. That lower power draw and reduced load temperature should bode well for:

Overclocking

NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 285 comes with a reasonable amount of overclocking headroom. With no additional cooling, we were able to raise GPU, shader and memory frequencies to 688MHz, 1,567MHz and 2,950MHz, respectively.

Whilst a stock-clocked GeForce GTX 285 may only provide performance on par with a pre-overclocked GeForce GTX 280, an overclocked 285 will stretch that lead a little bit further. Expect a range of pre-overclocked GeForce GTX 285 parts from the get go, and possibly higher-clocked cards when liquid-cooling comes into play.