facebook rss twitter

Review: NVIDIA (BFG) launches a new GeForce GTX 260: we take a look

by Tarinder Sandhu on 16 September 2008, 14:27

Tags: BFG GeForce GTX 260 OC, NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA), BFG Technologies

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qapdi

Add to My Vault: x

Final thoughts

NVIDIA has quietly rolled in the new GeForce GTX 260 that improves performance over and above the present GTX 260 by adding an extra processing cluster - 24 stream processors - to the GPU. The addition of the extra cluster gives it between 5-7.5 per cent extra oomph as gaming tests become bound by the GPU, and helps the card to gain slight leadership over the Radeon HD 4870.

We're a little miffed that clockspeeds weren't also increased in the transition between GTX 260s, but NVIDIA' steadfastedly leaving it up to its glut of partners to launch out-of-the-box overclocked models.

Thinking more of the new GTX 260, a sensible assumption would be that NVIDIA and TSMC - the manufacturing partner - have increased yields such that more GTX 2x0 GPUs are qualified for nine or 10 clusters. Knowing this, it makes sense to roll in a new product at literally no extra cost to the manufacturer.

We've mentioned the naming structure earlier in the review and do so again. The new card is also called GeForce GTX 260, and there will be a reasonable amount of time when both the 'new' 216SP and 'old' 192SP models co-exist. NVIDIA's done something like this in the recent past, with the GeForce 9800 GTX+ supplanting the 9800 GTX.

Unscrupulous vendors may attempt to ride on the new GTX 260 bandwagon and sell old stock for new prices, meaning that the buyer needs to be vigilant and clearly appreciate which technology is being purchased.

The introduction of the more-powerful GTX 260 also means that partners' pre-overclocked old GTX 260 models are rendered pretty much moot; they'll need to shift stock quickly.

Priced at around £199 for a default-clocked model and rising to around £230 for a pre-overclocked card like the BFG, performance is decent enough, we suppose, but such is the attractive pricing for a bone-stock GeForce GTX 280, at around £250, that we'd consider it instead of this BFG.

There's more to buying a graphics card than for just raw power, though, and NVIDIA continued efforts into Cuda and PhysX are beginning to become reasonably compelling reasons to look at the green team's products over ATI's.

Got around £199 to spend on a graphics card that can do more than paint pretty-looking pixels? The 'new' GeForce GTX 260 isn't a bad bet.

HEXUS Awards

The BFG GeForce GTX 260 MAXCORE OCX 896MB receives the HEXUS.labs certification for successfully completing our benchmark suite without issue. This is not an outright recommendation to buy, however.

 

Gaming HEXUS Labs

BFG GeForce GTX 260 MAXCORE OCX 896MB

HEXUS Where2Buy

TBC.

HEXUS Right2Reply

At HEXUS.net, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any BFG representatives choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



HEXUS Forums :: 15 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Bang for buck sums it up really. I was hoping this was going to be a fair bit cheaper, but alas it's not to be. I'll wait for the die shrink now and then re-evaluate.
I'm not sure the nVidia numbering scheme makes sense.

You have two identical chips, the G92 part for instance, so you call one of them the 8800GTS 512 and the other 9800GTX. Or you have a cut down one called 8800GT and you then have the same thing so you call it a 9800GT. Same chip, completely different names.

Then on the other hand you have different chips - 192 scalar vs 216 say, so you call them the same name, the GTX260.

:surrender:
Wow atleast your BFG package had a warning thing saying to register :P, mine didnt come with any warning i had to check on the internet my self iirc and i think i jusr registered it intime even though they didnt confirm it >.<(oh well my warranty is with scan for 999months o.O)

Nvidia have lost the plot when it comes to graphic card names, atleast with the change from 8800GTS to the new one made sense as it was called 8800GTS 512/g92 but they have a pretty different card and call it exactly the same, what gives? has their department ran out of numbers or something :P. Its not bad but i dont really see the point with doing this, they should of saved it for the die shrink imo.
But a die-shrink doesn't mean a whole lot to the consumer unless it's accompanied by higher clocks.

NVIDIA's kept them the same and, as far as we can tell, just used better yields to bring in an ‘all-new’ card.
I'm sick to death of Nvidia and their naming schemes. It's all about marketing and makes virtually no sense. You have to be constantly reading reviews etc to keep up to date, because the model numbers mean virtually nothing.

I want a HD4870 with a nicer cooler, but if the price is right on a new GTX260 then I'll have to get one. Lower idle power consumption is important.