facebook rss twitter

Corsair: 4GiB of RAM better than 2GiB!

by Parm Mann on 7 May 2008, 10:28

Tags: Corsair

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qam24

Add to My Vault: x

Who'd have thought?

Our friends over at Corsair have gone through a whole lot of testing to determine what we all already knew; 4GiB of memory is better than 2GiB of memory, particularly when you're gaming.

According to Corsair's Gareth Ogden, adding memory is one of the best and most cost effective methods of improving your PC’s performance. The memory manufacturer ran tests on an Intel P965-based PC using 2GiB and 4GiB memory array sizes (both in dual channel mode), while keeping memory frequency and latency timings constant. Corsair's own XMS2 DHX memory was used and though the results aren't surprising to most, Corsair itself was "surprised by the magnitude of many of these results," stated John Beekley, VP of Applications Engineering at Corsair.

The summary of Corsair's testing results is demonstrated in the following graph, highlighting the factor by which 4GiB is faster than 2GiB:

It might all sound a little clichéd coming from a memory manufacturer, but, it's true. With the current low pricing of DDR2 memory, from any manufacturer, doubling up from 2GiB to 4GiB is arguably one of the best routes for a significant performance boost for many users.

Users of a 32-bit Windows operating system should however be aware that you'll only be able to access up to 3.5GiB of memory, though, that too would provide a worthy jump in performance. If you're interested in Corsair's findings, take a long look at Corsair's 13-page PDF document; "Gaming Performance Analysis – 4GB vs 2GB".

Official press release: CORSAIR REAL-WORLD TESTING DEMONSTRATES SIGNIFICANT PERFORMANCE BENEFITS OF 4GB MEMORY FOR GAMING PCs



HEXUS Forums :: 27 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
ooh shocking!

can they test 8gb versus 4gb now please, seen as 8gb is only around £120.

what i'm thinking is which is better 2gb ddr3 @ £120 ish, or 8gb of ddr2 @ £120 ish. i would just like to know which, seen as my current pc has lasted almost 7 years. i would like my new one to do the same.
In other news, Core 2 Duo processors are faster than Core 2 processors :P
stevie lee;1414112
ooh shocking!

can they test 8gb versus 4gb now please, seen as 8gb is only around £120.

what i'm thinking is which is better 2gb ddr3 @ £120 ish, or 8gb of ddr2 @ £120 ish. i would just like to know which, seen as my current pc has lasted almost 7 years. i would like my new one to do the same.
The advantage 8gb will bring to most is debatable. Any process in a 32-bit system can only address 2gb, so the move to 4gb would allow more breathing space for other tasks, leaving that full 2gb to games, should it want it. The test system they used supposedly had Vista x64 installed, so that advantage is somewhat different, as I doubt many of the tests used more than about 3gb in total. Where 8gb really shines is in 64-bit Vista, and to SuperFetch, 8gb is like gold dust. Most programs are so much quicker than XP when it gets to learn what programs you use.

I've got 8gb, but I only did so for SuperFetch, as there are barely any 64-bit programs out there, and I wasn't paying full price for it.

Of your 2 choices, easily the 8gb DDR2.
2 of my memoory modules recently broke, leaving me with 2GB. The system was still fast, but the application loading times under Vista when I went back to 4GB are amazing.
We are doing some 8gb testing and plan to do more. Initially there are some improvements but initially not as much as from 2gb to 4gb. We'll publish the info when we have it. Watch for more great work from Gareth.