RSS 2.0 News Feed
HEXUS.net - Definitive Technology News and Reviews
Latest content
Graphics
Graphics
Sapphire Radeon HD 5970 in two-card CrossFireX
Latest Reviews
minimise maximise
Beans
minimise maximise
Guides
minimise maximise
Press Releases
minimise maximise
Hey, you! HEXUS and Dabs are giving away a Zotac graphics card!Win the fastest graphics card in the world with Sapphire!Enermax is giving away loads of swag... check it out!

Intel Nehalem CPU running at 3.20GHz, right now

CPU
CPU

Published: Wednesday 2nd April, 2008 | Author: Tarinder Sandhu
Companies: Intel (All Intel content)

Addthis
printer friendly layout     discuss in the forums     email to a friend
Advertisement

Nehlamen Intel put a dampener on prospective Spring IDF 2008 revelations by first announcing scant details of its upcoming Nehalem CPU architecture over a year ago, adding liberally at Fall IDF 2008, and then providing some real meat on the specifications' bones two weeks ago.

Combining what we know already, Nehalem will be core-scalable from two to eight execution cores on a single socket that, along with the architecture's simultaneous multi-threading, lead to concurrent four-to-16-thread computing. Initial desktop-oriented models, dubbed Bloomfield, will feature four execution cores with, obviously, eight-thread capability.

Nehalem, like the Core architecture, will provide platform-wide support, from notebooks to servers. Unlike Core (2), however, Nehalem will utilise a building-block approach that can potentially add-in non-CPU cores on to the die - integrated graphics being a prime example.

Thinking of the 1,366-pin, 731M-transistor quad-core model, each core will have access to its own 256KiB of L2 cache, and share a pool of 8MiB L3 cache The CPU's memory controller is integrated, supporting tri-channel DDR3-1333, and the processor will interface with an all-new I/O hub, Tylersburg - and each other in a two-socket environment - via the QuickPath point-to-point Interconnect that replaces the ageing, incumbent Front-Side Bus (FSB).

Tylersburg will support a single processor, via QuickPath, obviously, that'll be aimed at high-end desktop PCs, and a two-socket arrangement primarily aimed at the high-performance computing crowd. Hooking up to the southbridge - ICH10, most likely - via the present DMI bus. Expect to see the first iterations of Nehalem hit the shelves in Q1 2009

The long and short of it is that Nehalem, we reckon, will offer around 30 per cent better performance, on a clock-for-clock basis, when compared to Core 2, in a heavily-multithreaded environment - HPC and low-end servers, mainly. These gains diminish with lighter workloads that are the mainstay of the desktop environment, so don't be surprised to see some not-quite-as-impressive-as-expected numbers coming your way soon.

Naturally, Intel was keen to point out that early silicon, A1, was in good working order. That's why a number of Nehalem-based systems were on show at IDF 2008.




Here's a Bloomfield-based (quad-core) Nehalem system that was up and running a dynamic-airflow simulation.



Now, with the SMT present on the cores, the operating system sees eight processors in device manager. Remember, however, that it's a single-socket system.

Intel isn't talking about launch frequencies at the moment, but we expect to see Bloomfield ship at up-to 3.6GHz in Q4 2008.

The sample was running at 3.20GHz and, as you would expect, interfacing is tri-channel DDR3-1333 memory.

We weren't able to gain any performance numbers, no matter how much misdirection was aimed at the Intel representative.


HEXUS.community :: your right2reply

Re: Intel Nehalem CPU running at 3.20GHz, right now
doesnt matter what ghz its running at. you must know that ghz dont determine how fast a cpu is, its the architecture. if nehalem is THAT good, a 1ghz nehalem would probably be the same speed has a core 2 e6550Quote
Re: Intel Nehalem CPU running at 3.20GHz, right now
It's the clockspeed and architecture. It's pretty safe to assume that all else being equal a 3.2Ghz Nehalem will be faster than a 2.13Ghz Nehalem. Has it been suggested anywhere that the Nehalem is over 2x faster clock for clock than the Core2?Quote
Re: Intel Nehalem CPU running at 3.20GHz, right now
Well, Nehalem brings HyperThreading back into the Intel chips. So in theory you could see up to twice the performace *in certain circumstances*. By no means will that be across the board. I forget which operations benefited from Hyperthreading.

Clock for clock, betweeen 10% and 25% increase in performace is expected. With a 30% drop in power requirments.Quote
Re: Intel Nehalem CPU running at 3.20GHz, right now
It was more a comment about allegedly inaccurate info in the article than a comment on performance. I was interested in which was true.
Does anyone remember what clock speeds the A1 Core2 Duo silicon ran at 6 months before release. 1.6 GHz is a figure I had in mind - this may be rubbish. They were released over 1 Ghz faster at launch. If Nehalem is running at 3.2 Ghz on A1 silicon and intel's performance claims are not grossly exaggerated, then we are talking about some serious performance increase even over Penryn. Even so, Past performance is not a guide to the future etc etc ;)Quote
Re: Intel Nehalem CPU running at 3.20GHz, right now
Nehalems may not be running at 3.2GHz right now, but that figure won't be far off what Intel can achieve.

Nehalem was shown working months and months ago, and, looking at the past, HEXUS managed to snag some quality time with the Core 2 (Conroe), running at 2.67GHz, over four months before its launch.

HEXUS.net - Headline :: Intel finally set to smash AMD in performance stakes : Page - 1/5 (http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=4843)

Nehalem will be out in six months or so, and we can't wait.Quote

Reply

network installation
The correct systems can empower your company and network installation puts those systems in place.

My HEXUS


:: New User
:: Lost Password

Browser Plugins
:: IE7 Search
:: Firefox 2 Search
Hottest items
minimise maximise
Latest Poll
minimise maximise

Which OS launch are you more excited by?





Headlines
minimise maximise