Nehlamen
Intel put a dampener on prospective Spring IDF 2008 revelations by
first announcing
scant details of its upcoming Nehalem CPU architecture
over
a year ago, adding liberally at
Fall
IDF 2008, and then providing some real meat on the
specifications' bones
two
weeks ago.
Combining what we know already, Nehalem will be core-scalable from two
to eight execution cores on a single socket that, along with the
architecture's simultaneous multi-threading, lead to concurrent
four-to-16-thread computing. Initial desktop-oriented models, dubbed
Bloomfield, will
feature four execution cores with, obviously, eight-thread capability.
Nehalem, like the Core architecture, will provide platform-wide
support, from notebooks to servers. Unlike Core (2), however, Nehalem
will
utilise a building-block approach that can potentially add-in non-CPU
cores on to the die - integrated graphics being a prime example.
Thinking of the 1,366-pin, 731M-transistor quad-core model, each core
will have access to its own 256KiB of L2 cache, and share a pool of
8MiB
L3 cache The CPU's memory controller is integrated, supporting
tri-channel DDR3-1333, and the processor will interface with an all-new
I/O hub, Tylersburg - and each other in a two-socket environment - via
the QuickPath point-to-point Interconnect that replaces the ageing,
incumbent Front-Side Bus (FSB).
Tylersburg will support a single processor, via QuickPath,
obviously, that'll be aimed at high-end desktop PCs, and a
two-socket arrangement primarily aimed at the high-performance
computing crowd. Hooking up to the southbridge - ICH10, most likely -
via the present DMI bus. Expect to see the first iterations of Nehalem
hit the shelves in Q1 2009
The long and short of it is that Nehalem, we reckon, will offer around
30 per cent better performance, on a clock-for-clock basis, when
compared to Core 2, in a heavily-multithreaded environment - HPC and
low-end servers, mainly. These gains diminish with lighter workloads
that are the mainstay of the desktop environment, so don't be surprised
to see some not-quite-as-impressive-as-expected numbers coming your way
soon.
Naturally, Intel was keen to point out that early silicon, A1, was in
good working order. That's why a number of Nehalem-based
systems
were on show at IDF 2008.
Here's a Bloomfield-based (quad-core) Nehalem system that was up and
running a dynamic-airflow simulation.
Now, with the SMT present on the cores, the operating system sees eight
processors in device manager. Remember, however, that it's a
single-socket system.
Intel isn't talking about launch frequencies at the moment, but we
expect to see Bloomfield ship at up-to 3.6GHz in Q4 2008.
The sample was running at 3.20GHz and, as you would expect, interfacing
is tri-channel DDR3-1333 memory.
We weren't able to gain any performance numbers, no matter how much
misdirection was aimed at the Intel representative.
HEXUS.community :: your right2reply
Clock for clock, betweeen 10% and 25% increase in performace is expected. With a 30% drop in power requirments.Quote
Does anyone remember what clock speeds the A1 Core2 Duo silicon ran at 6 months before release. 1.6 GHz is a figure I had in mind - this may be rubbish. They were released over 1 Ghz faster at launch. If Nehalem is running at 3.2 Ghz on A1 silicon and intel's performance claims are not grossly exaggerated, then we are talking about some serious performance increase even over Penryn. Even so, Past performance is not a guide to the future etc etc ;)Quote
Nehalem was shown working months and months ago, and, looking at the past, HEXUS managed to snag some quality time with the Core 2 (Conroe), running at 2.67GHz, over four months before its launch.
HEXUS.net - Headline :: Intel finally set to smash AMD in performance stakes : Page - 1/5 (http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=4843)
Nehalem will be out in six months or so, and we can't wait.Quote
Reply