facebook rss twitter

Microsoft hoping to increase Vista adoption via piracy?

by Parm Mann on 4 December 2007, 12:25

Tags: Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qakl3

Add to My Vault: x

You must activate Windows within 3 days or...?

Right now, that sentence would finish with "Windows will stop working". That's all set to change however.

In a presentation regarding security features in Windows Vista's upcoming service pack by WGA senior product manager Alex Kochis, the key emphasis was on the following point:
“Based on customer feedback, we will not reduce user functionality on systems determined to be non-genuine”

Yep, that's right. Following Vista Service Pack 1, Microsoft will not reduce user functionality for illegal copies of Windows Vista, at all.

After various WGA glitches and server outages during the year, perhaps Microsoft has realised that rendering entire systems unusable isn't in its best interest. A Windows Vista system found to be fraudulent today will see a timer in which a user must activate the software. Failure to do so will see the desktop turn black, start menu disappear and files become inaccessible. Those are just a few of the countermeasures.

Users running Vista Service Pack 1 in 2008 however will avoid such inconveniences. Microsoft has opted to return to the XP-style WGA checks. If a system is found to be non-genuine, there will be no reduction in functionality but there will be plenty of reminders and prompts to inform you of your illegal software. Furthermore, critical windows updates will still be available via Windows Update. As with Windows XP, optional updates will only be available following validation of your software.

If Microsoft wants to see a big rise in Vista adoption after Service Pack 1, it's certainly going about it the right way.

Source: ZDNet.com



HEXUS Forums :: 7 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
hmmm… so increased piracy? or lack of ability to detect pirate copies? without the ability to define what is/isn't pirate?
piracy has always helped microsoft - why consider a “cheap” alternative, when you can get the “real thing” for “free”? it killed off most of the non-msoffice office suites
Making the bloody thing work properly with backward compatibility of drivers might help their cause more.
I've gone back to XP because half of my hardware and a lot of my software isn't supported under Vista.
Vista is very pretty but unless you have a totally standard system it just doesn't cut it.
Betty_Swallocks
Making the bloody thing work properly with backward compatibility of drivers might help their cause more.
I've gone back to XP because half of my hardware and a lot of my software isn't supported under Vista.
Vista is very pretty but unless you have a totally standard system it just doesn't cut it.

The blame there lies with third party driver developers - MS' decision to radically alter the driver model was/is a very good decision. I'm all for laying into MS when they do things wrong (and they do) but really, do ya think third parties could of had any more notice of Vista's arrival?
Feel free to let rip on MS for the networking bug or the lethargy of explorer..
I find it hard to believe Microsoft will have done this for altruistic reasons (and ‘user feedback’) so it sounds like it's either a tacit acknowledgement that they want to increase the user base of Vista or they're finding it harder to differentiate the legitimate and non-legitimate versions.

A fair few dedicated Windows users of my acquaintance are now using things like Ubuntu as well so I think this is a cynical but sensible step by MS.